From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15021: bug#15171: 24.3.50; (cl) `Common Lisp Compatibility' is incomplete Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:26:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87pot88s1d.fsf@gnus.org> References: <169588b2-7ae4-4387-bbe6-96270999ccd0@default> <87lhxm43cg.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461936463 11207 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2016 13:27:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15021@debbugs.gnu.org, 15171@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 29 15:27:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aw8S9-0007sW-R7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:27:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54373 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw8S5-0004bd-Uc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40853) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw8Rw-0004Oh-Ol for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:27:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw8Rl-00019N-4z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:27:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw8Rl-00018P-1w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw8Rh-00022c-K0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:27:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15021 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15021-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15021.14619364147827 (code B ref 15021); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15021) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2016 13:26:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw8RZ-000225-Th for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:26:54 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:54906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw8RR-00021T-K9; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:26:49 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw8RM-0008FP-GV; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:26:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lhxm43cg.fsf@building.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:48:15 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117166 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Drew Adams writes: > >> This appendix is only a brief summary, it seems, and can be quite >> misleading. I'm skeptical that it specifies "a list of all known >> incompatibilities" between the Emacs cl* libraries and Common Lisp. >> >> But it is correct that it _should_ specify them all. > > Or we could just change the line "The following is a list of all known > incompatibilities between this package and Common Lisp as documented in > Steele" to "a list of some of the more glaring incompatibilities"... I've now committed a similar wording. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no