From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23377: 25.0.93; Completion is extremely slow for insert-char Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:27:02 -0400 Message-ID: <87poa80w6h.fsf@moondust.localdomain> References: <87wpnlnrlz.fsf@gmail.com> <83mvog28d2.fsf@gnu.org> <87y47zke92.fsf@gmail.com> <838tzzzfd3.fsf@gnu.org> <87potbf5fb.fsf@gmail.com> <87fub4dtr9.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506803294 31158 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2017 20:28:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 20:28:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cc: 23377@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 30 22:28:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyOMo-0007WS-MZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 22:28:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40314 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyOMw-0007Lu-3C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:28:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59895) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyOMn-0007Kf-JT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyOMk-0003Mm-Ok for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32821) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyOMk-0003Mc-MH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyOMk-0007WD-D9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 20:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23377 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 23377-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23377.150680323328841 (code B ref 23377); Sat, 30 Sep 2017 20:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23377) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2017 20:27:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41502 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyOLx-0007V7-Al for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:27:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com ([209.85.214.42]:44342) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyOLu-0007Uq-25 for 23377@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id d192so2765134itd.1 for <23377@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 13:27:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=VthuFAUbdeg4olYAPMpb/fXqT2qVNp6sUYNnAgKMA28=; b=HC2PVw66m0Kz5A9y3ys7ArWKRmlL7HzY2WD+jZqP4JAkY/LjjpI8Iusl3mEmKbxPOu Xp8lpZ2tf8MYE7xANAvcowlncM04Cwa67XY2pkv+yAfl2D7BNHy2aB9kXUFNATDCzFty bB21+ot+Dq4cVn8YqD0snBe/nylWlqI0ZMK0e4AKByf6LTKqqXieejAuzecOj04JbEIU OJvNQXrn9ZtLOZdTb4c+e4+WZIbOi29KqExLWxQmXaTpUEf8VbfsuI0thRrouIYIfgxH JxnnYsOlUxUKYMtOs9U/exkSKiJOIxt7o7UZKnfKeUak7Y/Jh+tAIn2pngyzPLwKUX9+ slng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=VthuFAUbdeg4olYAPMpb/fXqT2qVNp6sUYNnAgKMA28=; b=s+OtSUX5TNGDTUUrp8xsK/9wxOw8HkBVIhAWJe4XWfmfeHvBw5qYJKcn3eEQgTucnC yH9d6wKaJv+87J5dvPrZcjzeXbKyLVyPYaRvJtOkyad+h9Aqf2DeIYBR8Ca+Hf78BjBN 9VHRvw4SrLZ2GwrWLp9e++7Gldqo8l3XYHH89Tnf2PFfnlCWMXKZ+o9MFOtwvvEzho2T hX7d5OJCIPMnB2Bblw4bRMgTYI92pnkZsY5SW/mWfzjP/ZyeG/mBXXa6DodoEshPbjhJ j82hGhJ5t8cOCw/UkWwQVH0Y5cHiqPSxmVlc9Ey93UWXlyByw1DO4gv5piUAmk9k5uZz pmfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVH3KEjpnrguVlzrL/SfXMGcLaA+pJ/LbdGaA44cOILPRs4WDUc goOeb0Vtl3Dx9vvHAoOd5p09EQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QC9e8Z526gZYTQBIUOAYrRt+KrO2B50oM5RDqbOIBzDI/5noVpT7pn9A/kJWiQThuerS31urA== X-Received: by 10.36.86.205 with SMTP id o196mr12608288itb.149.1506803224284; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from moondust.localdomain.nodomain.none ([72.143.113.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r132sm2968494iod.50.2017.09.30.13.27.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 30 Sep 2017 13:27:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fub4dtr9.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:40:58 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137713 Archived-At: At 12:40 -0400 on Saturday 2017-09-30, Noam Postavsky wrote: > > nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) writes: > >> At 10:21 +0300 on Wednesday 2016-04-27, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> >>> So what's the consensus here: do we need an option for turning >>> the character display off, or don't we? >> >> In my opinion FWIW (about 1.5 cents?), being able to see the >> character beside the name is too nice to give up for Emacs >> 25.1, but, at least until the feature is further refined and/or >> performance is improved, there needs to be a way to toggle it >> on and off. > > I think since Mark's patch from #28302 was applied the slowdown > isn't as bad, but some people were reporting much bigger waits > (depending on fonts I guess?) and I'm still seeing a noticable > wait on the order of 1 or 2 seconds, so IMO having a toggle > makes sense. I just retried my original recipe emacs -Q C-x 8 RET TAB on the emacs-26 branch and indeed it is amazingly much faster -- about one second here. It might be nice for those on older and slower hardware to have a toggle, but it is no longer so obviously necessary. N.