Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >>> Maybe drop the extra FETCH responses for now, and add proper bookkeeping >>> later when implementing the requested feature? >> >> Okay, I'll work something up in the next week that goes halfway with >> this. > > Did you get any further in fixing this nnimap parsing bug? Here's a whack at it. I tried to make sure that it would handle unwanted FETCH responses whether they came before or after (or in the middle of) the wanted FETCH responses, but I'm not in love with checking the header regexp this way. Because this IMAP server feature is very closely focused on adding a flag in case of attachment (and because Gnus never explicitly requests this flag, though I'd sure like to in the future), another more targeted approach would be to simply delete any lines containing $Has\(No\)?Attachment, assuming that these FETCH responses will only take up one line. I've configured my local Dovecot with the offending setting, and will test it out for a bit. Eric