From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34177: smtpmail.el aborts on transient errors Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 01:27:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnjzom9b.fsf@gnus.org> References: <70A0D375-0530-45D8-B4A4-B7BDF009749D@evenmere.org> <87h87vqd64.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87muf3q5d8.fsf@gnus.org> <55197E44-680A-4C59-8D3B-F37FBC132979@me.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="163917"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 34177@debbugs.gnu.org To: Brian Sniffen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 17 01:28:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iA0Pk-000gXb-Bp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 01:28:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40692 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iA0Pj-0001Rd-Ao for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:28:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49357) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iA0Pb-0001RR-Lh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iA0Pa-0000OJ-NA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iA0Pa-0000OF-KE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iA0Pa-0005Es-ED for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34177 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed moreinfo patch Original-Received: via spool by 34177-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34177.156867643820065 (code B ref 34177); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2019 23:27:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51354 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iA0Or-0005DZ-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:27:18 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:42028) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iA0Oq-0005DO-2w for 34177@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iA0Om-00082h-Ix; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 01:27:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55197E44-680A-4C59-8D3B-F37FBC132979@me.com> (Brian Sniffen's message of "Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:17:24 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166604 Archived-At: Brian Sniffen writes: > Oh! I did write back a little while ago. Let me try now from a > different address. It seemed to reduce the problem greatly. Thank > you! At a limit of 20 requests, it was gone. Can this be a > customizable constant? Sure; makes sense. I've now added smtpmail-retries to the trunk. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no