From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26587: 26.0.50; Gnus signs with false S/MIME key Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 22:42:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnj53b2q.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87fuh22dk6.fsf@wilson.bronger.org> <87r241kb4y.fsf@gnus.org> <87pnj6s3bj.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="123217"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 26587@debbugs.gnu.org To: Torsten Bronger Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 09 23:50:27 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJql-000Vwe-0j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:50:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59986 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJqj-000330-MS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:50:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39049) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIInb-0002pd-PH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 16:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIInZ-0007dk-VS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 16:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIInW-0007cT-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 16:43:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIInW-0003jO-50; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 16:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26587 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 26587-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26587.157065374914299 (code B ref 26587); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26587) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2019 20:42:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIImy-0003iW-4U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 16:42:29 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:43716) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIImw-0003iN-9n for 26587@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 16:42:26 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIIms-0004OC-1R; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 22:42:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pnj6s3bj.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> (Torsten Bronger's message of "Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:58:24 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168800 Archived-At: Torsten Bronger writes: > I would like the second key to be used. But Gnus signs the email > with the first certificate. If I understand the code correctly, `epg-start-sign' is run here, and gpgsm is started with the parameters looking like "--detach-sign" "-u" "4A44812B553ACE6D" "-u" "4A44812B553ACEetc" with as many "-u"s as there are in your gpgsm store that matches whatever you've set up in that list that lists all your identities you want to use. Could you edebug that function to see if that's really what happens? Because if it is, we're leaving the decision to gpgsm itself which user ID to use, and that seems very sub-optimal. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no