From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10870: 24.0.92; ansi-term broken on some Solaris platforms Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 23:41:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87pnibw76u.fsf@marxist.se> References: <1329933176.80291.YahooMailNeo@web30607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="178838"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 10870@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jim Marks Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 01 23:42:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQfcR-000kOe-V1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 23:42:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43452 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQfcQ-0005iV-Hs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 18:42:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQfcJ-0005iH-8l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 18:42:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQfcI-0007Az-7D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 18:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQfcI-0007Av-0j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 18:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQfcH-00034D-Se for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 18:42:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 22:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10870 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 10870-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10870.157264809911752 (code B ref 10870); Fri, 01 Nov 2019 22:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10870) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2019 22:41:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQfbv-00033S-1y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 18:41:39 -0400 Original-Received: from host.gofardesign.uk ([208.79.239.190]:45195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQfbt-000339-Oz for 10870@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 18:41:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marxist.se; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=OfwUZvay9q3suaNxgAHpAxnp8cBttygR4a9DQ89oLLo=; b=ZoXddl8YH10H0po+cge7hIiacQ ctdmb98Uxsi2JvFPYXu2yb50tZA6LRVC1jeqeI12C4pg8l3bGmGsy3IvqwhC6Zid0uTrMLPxLdvvg o3I9+uPT0euJ5VQYDXxET28nnhg8BvWGgteGJ+5Vh4DFSpLn5REpJlTOhmCK16ewKvbE=; Original-Received: from h-70-69.a785.priv.bahnhof.se ([155.4.70.69]:45576 helo=localhost) by host.gofardesign.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iQfbn-0005Z9-MO; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:41:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1329933176.80291.YahooMailNeo@web30607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Jim Marks's message of "Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:52:56 -0800 (PST)") X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.gofardesign.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - marxist.se X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.gofardesign.uk: authenticated_id: stefan@marxist.se X-Authenticated-Sender: host.gofardesign.uk: stefan@marxist.se X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170700 Archived-At: Jim Marks writes: > This bug concerns ansi terminal emulation as invoked by the "ansi-term" > command. It works fine on sparc Solaris, but fails on i386 Solaris. > The symptom occurs during initial loading of the shell (bash in my > case) in ansi-term. The following gets displayed at the bottom of the frame: > > "No such directory found via CDPATH environment variable" > > This behavior continues for each shell command, and even on simple > entry. > > Part of the problem seems to be the string that term.el:'term-emulate-terminal' > passes to 'term-command-hook'. > > (let ((end (string-match "\r?$" str i))) > (if end > (funcall term-command-hook > (prog1 (substring str (1+ i) end) > (setq i (match-end 0)))) > > I could see that on sparc, the value value of 'str' in the above code ends > with a single ^M which is handled correctly (stripped) use the RE in > the string-match. On i386, the value of 'str' terminates with ^M^M. > So, the above string-match just gets rid of one of them, and the other > gets passed to the cd function, causing the confusion. As a temp fix in > my own emacs, I have replaced '?' in the RE with '*'. This was reported 7 years ago, but unfortunately never got a reply at the time. I note that this code has changed quite a bit since this was reported. Are you still seeing this on a modern version of Emacs? Best regards, Stefan Kangas