From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43381: 27.1.50; Maybe wrong cursor FG color in NS port Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:06:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87pn6jjqdz.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87a6xtff19.fsf@gnus.org> <20200913234309.GH93185@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <87d02pdyp4.fsf@gnus.org> <83363kbeci.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1r39qmb.fsf@gnus.org> <83v9gf85hj.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6xoqxkr.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo0s5uen.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn6kphmw.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuvw5tbi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36681"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 43381@debbugs.gnu.org, alan@idiocy.org, dale@codefu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 18 13:07:41 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJEEv-0009R7-Md for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:07:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37558 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJEEu-0001ew-P8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:07:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJEEI-0001eG-Lw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57722) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJEEI-0001OW-86 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJEEI-0001JQ-0r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43381 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 43381-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43381.16004271975003 (code B ref 43381); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 11:06:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41035 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJEDs-0001Ic-HC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:06:37 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52756) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJEDq-0001IQ-Mb for 43381@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:06:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Zz91vXzP1QxjrEhjIOYCNVRpc33ygJYrU9IkNCox8C0=; b=eTJ69Jtsd0GStJ8/VtfY5q92j9 KAR7qDeUFwv3W4kYCaeqa0/JMYu/K7oDmxYQIla5/HVJ6lKti8cVvMnQe3i7GIzjzmCDv3YzyHXJN TR342mlhGXkEubgt4YTFd6s1V15BQeC9/4wXQ9Pm2MpSaGcucd+iSFbejk5w3y0H/JYY=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJEDa-0004x4-3n; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:06:28 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAIVBMVEX+/vvk1dGlYGKR MjrLoJ+KGinDnZyUOUGgP0aAVFX///9OLS67AAAAAWJLR0QKaND0VgAAAAd0SU1FB+QJEgorLYg5 KpsAAAE/SURBVDjLxZLNS8NAEMXbGKLHQsF6VBe827FOvAnpx70liLciIXcZYTwqUdo/28l2Qzfj 7smDAzmEt/vmN29nMPhLDWNCMooI45iw2EYEcxnp/X4bFtL8PgKVT8PCBe/CWMWueQxD7ZswVrPn 1yBtznwXhELmINYZS/lYWbWsq/m8NgxIN3W1rKqX6/ZAOittIQEiSJXl7NneTDYkv+0HbAsfnGMB h0JilgMIVx3ot1NYwJjo7Ui6sRcArdPUQys6q9bMz8WZIRB6RkczYOgZeWTMWxVI9nQQfqWVYDsi ca6FMdg4mPTrLmwswqt7GHtc5v5Qz0duclRLlwoUfcmTsFo6gcL1KJPJFe+ptJCMVqixCqJ2dYZG YxmXUQZq6QjcwQn2li6Fz47b9LCS9THNHtaJ13HiY537IegY/6F+AKqTW3idEuXzAAAAJXRFWHRk YXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIwLTA5LTE4VDEwOjQzOjQ1KzAwOjAwNvmniQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2Rp ZnkAMjAyMC0wOS0xOFQxMDo0Mzo0NSswMDowMEekHzUAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Stina Nordenstam's _Dynamite_: "Until" In-Reply-To: <83tuvw5tbi.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:14:25 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188287 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I understand. The result will be that every character under cursor > will look the same regardless of its original face colors. Oh, I didn't think of that as an issue... I mean, the cursor blinks (by default), so... does anybody care? > Which is both losing information and different from the face-merging > we do everywhere else. > > The original problem, AFAIU, was not that we behave as we do, but that > the result is almost illegible in some situations. Yup. > The solution to that doesn't have to be what you propose, it can be > something else, which doesn't ignore our usual face-merging. We just > need to use a mechanism we have for this purpose: the > distant-foreground color of a face. The vast majority of faces don't have a distant-foreground, I think? And that's in relation to the region face, not the cursor? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no