From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46240: Sorting order of read-char-by-name Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:34:17 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87pn1fo42e.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87v9bb4tm2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83wnvr65zg.fsf@gnu.org> <875z3aooao.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfc666vr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87tuqti2kw.fsf@gnus.org> <87bld1hvwg.fsf@gnus.org> <87zh0lq6n8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87lfc4gtam.fsf@gnus.org> <87zh0kw4n1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h7mrq002.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35640"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 46240@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 04 23:47:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7nP7-00099q-KA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 23:47:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53178 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7nP6-0001qY-Lh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:47:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7nOw-0001pI-Qy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7nOv-0004PR-Rb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7nOv-00071W-P1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 22:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46240 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 46240-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46240.161247877826946 (code B ref 46240); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 22:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46240) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2021 22:46:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42418 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7nOD-00070X-MN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:46:18 -0500 Original-Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:54367) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7nO9-00070I-S6 for 46240@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:46:16 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 91.129.108.204 Original-Received: from mail.gandi.net (m91-129-108-204.cust.tele2.ee [91.129.108.204]) (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75C40FF808; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:46:05 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87h7mrq002.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:19:09 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199332 Archived-At: >> Oops, I noticed that my previous implementation sorted by names >> inside each block, not by code. I'm not sure if this makes sense? >> Definitely, sorting by code inside blocks should be implemented >> as the primary feature, but should an additional option with previous >> implementation be retained to sort inside blocks by names too? > > Having the option to sort by names within each block sounds nice to me. Oh, then sorting order of sections would need own option. Currently sections are sorted by section names (i.e. mostly by script names alphabetically, e.g. "adlam", "aegean-number", "ahom", etc.), but a new option could sort them by their boundary codepoints (i.e. "basic-latin", "latin-supplement", "latin-extended"), so now options are going out of control :)