From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48598: 28.0.50; buffer-naming collisions involving bouncers in ERC Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:54:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87pml933cv.fsf__31281.2729900301$1650618943$gmane$org@gmx.de> References: <875yzakzvi.fsf@neverwas.me> <87leweez89.fsf@neverwas.me> <87fsmlp0gy.fsf@gnus.org> <878rsc2gp5.fsf_-_@gmx.de> <878rsbdipd.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfqjvjcx.fsf@neverwas.me> <87sfqi2119.fsf@gmx.de> <87v8vah54l.fsf@neverwas.me> <87h76ucrq4.fsf@gmx.de> <87h76tde5k.fsf@neverwas.me> <87czhgce1s.fsf@gmx.de> <871qxucvls.fsf@neverwas.me> <87o80ybauv.fsf@gmx.de> <87pmlao9ax.fsf@neverwas.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4645"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 48598@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-erc@gnu.org To: "J.P." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 22 11:15:37 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nhpO5-000112-18 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:15:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52406 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhpO3-0007I7-H5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 05:15:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhp4D-0003tL-1Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 04:55:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhp4C-0000Gi-NO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 04:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhp4A-00007U-J6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 04:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48598 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 48598-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48598.1650617677412 (code B ref 48598); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48598) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2022 08:54:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhp3l-00006a-HE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 04:54:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:35125) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhp3j-00006K-NM for 48598@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 04:54:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1650617666; bh=hN1ubC189q+RVTWpB6IfLajBtTM6K6dAuR6L7RJ0f0A=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=EeqBPllIw2D2/Ns4Nd1iIabCGsbHSYLnSkTOkSR4SzydcTPXegVNmr6iIDbkaJC7j m4dY4a36y3BuGKdCA/V51LLU60U+jAp7uO21SFCtmWRmAVlF/9cANh5xJY1aF95k7j MHoqTM+88/40ZxWEaijxHtPMpv38Ef/SRL/6rUYI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([213.220.148.148]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MBUqL-1nc0B30CnX-00CwqR; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:54:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pmlao9ax.fsf@neverwas.me> (J. P.'s message of "Thu, 21 Apr 2022 06:28:06 -0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:PXPgTm91g+ziRle+oDr7KHjWt2PYTHOl3NXE58UTT7z+zSZe3HD P/mJnhhIEAtdyqf/rpozmiYaiPFhjUhskGbZ+2HT+bkdS3HqEKFZ1kxct+DsV3vI08pEIM3 4GqhqnK2plFnkOKc5R3A+O/Vi/lpHQ5i0k9JJ7P43ZbXktqQn+8dslhZZ+DzvacHjmPtOgG hruKnRkj9M+bqrGpzCrjQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:KOrclli2xuE=:fVT0vMFKLeJiPRv6pp7x5E +oTkpRiIvL5+lA0ZdiC6wY9o+nRBjxbzVVJXdkmsE/W/KqBQqXQxYO5RZxBNU767MIIVnI0jP JrsUhArjVhzN/Y0L7UTjHJaUQ0goO8QIhbrq12RLW4vE/A7AQltbzqM8hk/7CV64kY2NxqnqB ETtKT82yhBYW/3TgExlhw3Trasj+jzO2l8uinvN1j3GL1meRhc7NjZgsgHzKfETlLzhli+Xio rpEvM08bWcbqvMqKxchazI5TCFbSH5eI8nDYXlN2dK/oqwTPuFxDzHstnlEiU+2qYSWrsX1uD GfJk2SOiTRckqN1H5eq+mDWySB/ZU0UJNaf3yCJo2+HkAbthMF9utlxSKOt/NM8PGSFOFzU+b xv04PdYbxyhUGz6Lp538aQv+16QQieJ6ngRFrzUxj33PdyzpFdBkvC6e9LZXvCpySkU0wFgKI a/+Rf7IU4iNHXiUD7UopRq4r4G8VLZWZ+GU7LX6h+wFO1bdsnfXimZITPHFq+XiJMsuzJLCpW HpIWRKS2PuKIrH4+LZm0hW37TtDDLyRWMlTrpczSjWQaeXIniNty6SltoLo3ZKm4apD828doH aT0GXibQiVFz6MLVrqBTeMI0blEWmElgTIeRZr6ebgAMvbbO2Gqi3FgFZUcMhqz3pGLkbZDvQ pIif0163zt2FB7CFDwl/IcXxTGBb8ykftnTx2JETnbus3tlYTOD5GVCQaegkuQ+FJglQVC1oi fcc59u6or+HRScAZ13tp9FaEeeAZh/y/Dp+5jmcNzxnwqyZumyeLHSo3jkRq+L/Ix+VxP1gS X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:230407 Archived-At: "J.P." writes: Hi, >> If this fixes the problem, pls push the patch. And change the files >> under test/infra/ accordingly, please. > > Thanks, I'd be happy to do that. > > Although, in light of my observations above, if you think it might make > more sense to solicit additional insights (possibly relating the two), I > could open a new bug instead. Alternatively (or in addition to that), I > could run a few pipelines with the flag set to -j4 for various targets, > perhaps with and without this patch applied, just to refresh and maybe > revise our current understanding. (Just a thought.) Well, you have your own Emacs branch. Perhaps you apply there the Makefile patch, and add -j4 to the respective make -C test calls in the gitlab test jobs, and see what happens? Well, maybe -j2 is more appropriate on emba, because it has two processors with one core per processor: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- root@emba:~# lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 2 On-line CPU(s) list: 0,1 Thread(s) per core: 1 Core(s) per socket: 1 Socket(s): 2 NUMA node(s): 1 Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD CPU family: 21 Model: 1 Model name: AMD Opteron 62xx class CPU Stepping: 2 CPU MHz: 2100.024 BogoMIPS: 4200.04 Hypervisor vendor: KVM Virtualization type: full L1d cache: 64K L1i cache: 64K L2 cache: 512K NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0,1 Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb lm rep_good nopl extd_apicid tsc_known_freq pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx hypervisor lahf_lm cmp_legacy cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw xop fma4 vmmcall arat --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Best regards, Michael.