From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56388: Overline equivalent of x-underline-at-descent-line Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 09:51:52 +0800 Message-ID: <87pmik8gxz.fsf@yahoo.com> References: Reply-To: Po Lu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21509"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: 56388@debbugs.gnu.org To: Hendrik Rommeswinkel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 05 03:53:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o8XkV-0005N7-6I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 03:53:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57290 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o8XkT-0005a2-SE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 21:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o8XkM-0005Zp-Lb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 21:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o8XkM-0006vv-D9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 21:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o8XkM-0000iN-8Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 21:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Po Lu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 01:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56388 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56388-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56388.16569859292679 (code B ref 56388); Tue, 05 Jul 2022 01:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56388) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2022 01:52:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48895 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o8XjV-0000h9-AA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 21:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic314-21.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.189.147]:43211) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o8XjT-0000ga-EG for 56388@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2022 21:52:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1656985921; bh=wfaHnPhg4oPNddnAorxDzWaMt9vn3JtHXhuI6Dhiig0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=X+0S3shzuFUSrBLXYfVckI7fyBayqbzXh3XppaltTU/oP9fk1GzAGi00NwyY6fZQt0zCZRxGmKX1aX6wFLD/nQ3NU3U8k6lnygX4dnFcmQ0J1LHrsXgDybcCxFbX8Cgr1m6yiD0levqiajgxo9XfKZazpenAWRJnqKKuuId1l01SLQiQESSZ/b78NrOZNDd4Zo/VYOrrtaKcbKY8F8vPM+GGG4j95E4mM6WdNy9mOFUuXRCJpiKZqhrPc3AIfCSo6/Lzp6ctReYJhGIO8+xCoDFwHoZ+3r7zJNmzcsGeiBW7mEA7XqVrGX6Bhx7WoxwUPAq7kIdGeOG1TqXaiejT5A== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1656985921; bh=egx66Wg033deXDlPm2HM9RoHiibXMhZeEVfOC3GI9ov=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=VcOZ+sGKoTxpUCsIgzX09wXXfMyxor8v0Iz3ZfuVT0sZWKUAmsIcSapUtE7xjRpzzasuBkUNQuuMwsgiMD2uGFtknpFwjRCp1bOUVxLWxfiJR5J/BIZPXxehDWG0zmqYR/by6i3jwP+NWM8s9j7pTnacYm0ebpeiXnPZiBu5IsSLTzSolBGKTTj+l5OaiCSbK8w3voLx1ToAmrEGwEGssEBsmtgV+ac6V8Iv+0u5Bn5QqB+BwhF30fd/Dx4STUQ3GX2pFMxD40hk0SI/B7yJNckwK1L8+9qGfKyN+qAdqljBynICobTD0afZee68i+lc4vMrlJdMJ4K7rpjR2dzJEw== X-YMail-OSG: SudNi.cVM1kMJTpDtedSaHpm5c.PXt9akxmmnUxYcb0vMmxxx7zaW0pymVtilNO Lz8Yj2Nu4gRgjW8UIQp4E0fMNdxl5P1qsStI6MhYaUBTyTs0DUl_PP_loKksPae5QnnpNMNXd1GO 4OQW7gyhW47BPUh7LQX8lrSBYHE4T6iwQsXZWTUf1.shIaat8_KjQUOknRz2.bsZnTx4lCRs55zn ACBWNa3KyJw6SNxuC3XdMzmEx3gvybiDXVXHduEtCuFbUis8GtoBjogQLLPjdcrm4gUb3qFzLdGX Ti3pjHJ0zspfMX67_jqgqpGQWsc6.k3FoqA2eCbL52oor2YZGN1nB7yh9OmdJJLZQLQ5W6WXPuUa EKeexrbLG9pwxSaeFx6H7GuUCqmU_.jhAWOfS8aaTgWc3ERhowyd.KL4tmLvWMxhDBGE1W0WMFTV pyHazNWUARDanIGfGIGePf.0k8FlVOQ_EpkCWt_YHVYcpp0So4CgO6e9kOU.WYcoZclqH36W1HLJ zN6zS7AhQxTPNI8P_yoPJ336t1IUy3TYiAiYZH3DaTesz6Ko2hhyXW54Ei2otNV.BvUy6NqpN4PB ncWbh4tzvqnb7gM7h6iWAuZ3MW292nUdE906UtYOSfv5JMKpkYMn9.2YwovbnIZqdgu8uLfRhVbM 7iOr7KLVKI_94aIsdfcP_omc9HhSZKqSdjVRwZWGkh5m.v2b32G5ipp72VAoPUMGNB5tRgYCw71l 7KpeGuQZlyhW5YDSuF2Rd_9IR_I8jOvWKXko4YmPob_qK_uyDwxIbuXsWrVFiWep.YcF6ryrk6rt 6qDROXsSdufvaVCswsWFfkJ3XbM_qE_ya5.IvewBTq X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic314.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 01:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--canary-production-sg3-67975bbd4b-wpvcf (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID fcd081ad54f488f73abb1a8150f28637; Tue, 05 Jul 2022 01:51:56 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Hendrik Rommeswinkel's message of "Mon, 04 Jul 2022 18:25:55 +0000") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.20381 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:236080 Archived-At: Hendrik Rommeswinkel writes: > I noticed that overline text is not as configurable as underline > text. Using x-underline-at-descent-line, it is possible to choose > between placing the underline at the baseline or the bottom line (I > think the naming of this option is not quite right.). However, it is > not possible to choose between placing the overline at the ascent line > or the top line. Instead it is always at the top line. This makes > overline very ugly when the height of faces differs on a line because > the overline will appear at the very top of the line instead of on top > of the font. > > It would be nice if there would be an option x-overline-at-ascent-line > which places the overline at the ascent line (instead of the top > line). Instead of making it a user option, how about making it an attribute for the `:overline' face property?