From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58839: [Patch] Re: bug#58839: 29.0.50; project-kill-buffer fails when Eglot is running Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:51:53 +0000 Message-ID: <87pme7gd6e.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87sfj8umwb.fsf@posteo.net> <87edur3lil.fsf@posteo.net> <87a65f3j40.fsf@posteo.net> <213f3549-de4e-25a7-5e27-d13893e557bc@yandex.ru> <87zgdfwkle.fsf@gmail.com> <8e31a89d-e35e-6dd0-a8e3-f0b9684c8bfa@yandex.ru> <87v8o3wgq1.fsf@gmail.com> <87ilk2x1si.fsf@gmail.com> <871qqq7l9p.fsf@posteo.net> <87eduqwekz.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn8invbx.fsf@posteo.net> <877d0iw8iq.fsf@gmail.com> <837d0hhlke.fsf@gnu.org> <46ff0065-5645-ef1e-2621-242fb6a73f98@yandex.ru> <87v8o0uxn5.fsf@gmail.com> <87k04ggixk.fsf@posteo.net> <875yfzvawz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13976"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , manuel.uberti@inventati.org, 58839@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 01 11:53:28 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1opotc-0003OX-2n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 11:53:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opotE-0005C8-2x; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opotC-0005Bk-RB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1opotC-0007KU-Jc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1opotC-0003mX-FP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58839 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 58839-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58839.166729992214429 (code B ref 58839); Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58839) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2022 10:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42834 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oposD-0003kS-Pz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:42379) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oposB-0003kD-Ua for 58839@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2022 06:52:00 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6974D240101 for <58839@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:51:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1667299914; bh=9W3kVx4UOPrL/fc5FYsR1UnBHRmZAEbt1vGqOqT6AJw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=dJtPvcqxYkBEG50a/TNBp0zr18t9lYxjg0Y4K1VeuI+8pF2YnRhVyh3eC6NO6sgFg pSdEogL1rxJp/XfhZikwBPyQDDOgrnpVCKoCx4U593EZr7YKR4n6OjRaZHHNx9lWdh GwzXrcXp750R8RYMvToYBqfhNrOps/Aiz72907dx7UyQb3Ry/nCDaTUZaIG7aNJZxq KH1+Ql2PkHnlxq9KG7ocPMfc1YB0SomBSIYpEVq5KJ92e5Yqvp0wSJ1GgeDVD+liXF +UjYXVNHJg1FriugOfqI/oqO9N8BB25lodzLQVVw0kAr5g4Jq2tp6TgXSQi+Rb8jfn C48F9ENaCFv5Q== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4N1mzs5R4rz9rxF; Tue, 1 Nov 2022 11:51:53 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <875yfzvawz.fsf@gmail.com> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?="'s message of "Mon, 31 Oct 2022 23:19:24 +0000") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:246762 Archived-At: Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora writes: > In practice, I doubt many people are setting these variables. A GitHub > code search, where it is normally easy to find customizations of > variables since users version their configurations there, turns up 0 > results for customizations of project-ignore-buffer-conditions and not > more than a handful for project-kill-buffer-conditions, for example. In > contrast you can see hundreds of people setting things like > eglot-autoshutdown or ibuffer-filter-groups (and settings of > scroll-bar-mode are in the thousands). So I'd say the risk is minimal > and the benefit considerable. If people are customising the variable everything is fine, the issue I was thinking about were those who are relying on the default behaviour that might change without them expecting it to.