From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61277: FR: ELPA security - Restrict package builds to signed git commits Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 12:07:32 +0000 Message-ID: <87pmajavp7.fsf@localhost> References: <87pmapqoo5.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <87sffh8zts.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28357"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mail@daniel-mendler.de, 61277@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 09 13:08:17 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pQ5ir-0007Ch-BV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 13:08:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pQ5if-0003za-Q2; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 07:08:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pQ5ic-0003vR-W9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 07:08:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pQ5ic-0001I8-8C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 07:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pQ5ib-0005pa-N8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 07:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 12:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61277 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61277-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61277.167594442922348 (code B ref 61277); Thu, 09 Feb 2023 12:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61277) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2023 12:07:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57760 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pQ5hl-0005oO-8m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 07:07:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:42055) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pQ5hj-0005nx-7f for 61277@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 07:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE97B24050E for <61277@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 13:07:00 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1675944421; bh=620RtGqWMhOWTv5exRRuME+EvFen/Kr+0tmt0Ba3f+0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=TAfGzSNBj6gnYkAb1iKC2/WXFOmlb+t6kJPxMJblKc2IQImpQfV0zREJW2qyHK5+f H5p3aT5aHQq7LIaRH59QEvK4a6su/vV06de+to1OyD9PuIs3QajNKwusF2kcYSIB3t DL0bkNg2Xvot+fYDPWtRLJEVNEyrIOF74MBxyC7vK/BLOBLP/hhEpR9ayRAcdbAGps yCrqD1SX7qIOmpTMj033F6isInNqoY2rDz+ToXR2pFVmLBb9FOvfxpxmIfHr7Hfohg eVqnL47fjccKs200GX1vdchxZNcN44LW7nTQOfjO9o1/td9gyaR6dO6gxGgsPEdlBY EWsN0jQu75kIQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4PCFwL5WT4z9rxB; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 13:06:56 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:255216 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > This was explicitly requested to be made into a bug ticket on > > emacs-devel. See > > https://yhetil.org/emacs-devel/CADwFkmkx3J=LvWT1upGMBaC3MRuyuxmAOB4ghRpYu-BCuX3sSg@mail.gmail.com > > I looked at that URL but I can't understand what it says. I see > several ways to parse "This was explicitly requested to be made into a > bug ticket on emacs-devel" so I don't know what it means. Can you > state your point more explicitly and not tersely? I meant that Daniel submitted this bug ticket after Stefan's message stating that >>> I think we should add some flag to the build system saying that a >>> package should only be released if the new tag has a valid signature... >>> >>> IMO, opening a feature request for this in the bug tracker would be >>> useful. A patch would be even better. The emacs-devel discussion that includes the topic of this FR has been started earlier in the thread I linked to. So, there is no need to move this FR to emacs-devel - it is already being discussed there. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at