From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61325: 30.0.50; Jokes in GNUS manual Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 10:25:35 +0000 Message-ID: <87pma6j6jk.fsf@localhost> References: <87ttzy7pg1.fsf@localhost> <87wn4u6xj0.fsf@yahoo.com> <873577570z.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32886"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 61325@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 19 11:26:29 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pTgtp-0008KQ-Ai for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 11:26:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pTgtR-00087Q-F9; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 05:26:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pTgtP-00086y-Ap for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 05:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pTgtP-0002dl-2G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 05:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pTgtO-0007NZ-W6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 05:26:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 10:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61325 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61325-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61325.167680231128279 (code B ref 61325); Sun, 19 Feb 2023 10:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61325) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2023 10:25:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45764 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pTgsZ-0007M1-3c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 05:25:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:36797) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pTgsV-0007LB-EE for 61325@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 05:25:08 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E86D2400DF for <61325@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 11:25:00 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1676802301; bh=Oh83+3WIzIuN0ywsmLU4tReLnE6HNitrEKpfGxfU45k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=RQzZxPKQxu3FhMg4sTp7nnugjauLT8iIYnxAU+uRJcTKHBL+KEJRB7fmx0DFxnJ3F kDbvJTfqSMxaLUfvnZvKB+HFSfHWrzVPNQ2Zlq3w6X4pOFyTrWwAWXGGLx+NIOf3bG J87B8xisrcnVpltp4g/bNsdVodGOCs40+cN85xVJpGjTnmNeij764x4StGDmveakco 2ttdSL9vWdJAD6YMJmiBVhZD+/YHRuKoIdjO9rGiw58c6Tl/6qGcwmOHsHCzbj98ZW NUpxpKdesPbVJ4Lk0niJ4Ypo8fQ/7EjDBLU+B23a+509s7A8rZvhpzP6CZ7qRhzsZl gklgOdRySTMUA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4PKMB40NsVz6tqs; Sun, 19 Feb 2023 11:24:59 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256045 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > > We owe no special consideration to people who try to impose their > > > unrelated hgypersensitivities on others. They are demanding power > > > which nobody should have. > > > I can see the point, but does it apply to well-known sensitive topics, > > like sex, races, politics, etc? > > Nowadays there is a fashion for hypersensitivity; whatever the topic. > If you approach within 50 feet, some will say "That's offensively > close." No one is entitled to that much control over others. I agree in general. However, not following the fashion for hypersensitivity does not mean doing the opposite-ignoring that fact that some statements/topics can be sensitive/offensive. There should be a boundary, albeit not the same with specific country standards. I proposed the boundary to be the topics well-known to be sensitive for the whole cultures. Or it can be a different boundary - a consensus among users across the world. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at