From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68842: 29.2; implicit declaration of function 'XOpenDisplay' Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 09:56:59 +0800 Message-ID: <87plxhndzo.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <86sf2d1kk4.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Po Lu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39058"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Ulrich =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=BCller?= , 68842@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 01 02:58:16 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rVMLI-0009zA-Hv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 02:58:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVMKz-00064o-4t; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:57:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVMKv-00062u-GG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:57:53 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rVMKu-0005O2-Lt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:57:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVML3-0006CK-Sw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:58:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Po Lu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 01:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68842.170675264523780 (code B ref 68842); Thu, 01 Feb 2024 01:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2024 01:57:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39363 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVMKT-0006BU-7B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:57:25 -0500 Original-Received: from sonic303-22.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.188.148]:46804) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rVMKR-0006BE-CJ for 68842@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 20:57:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1706752628; bh=zzTUdYr30mEEZe7JwpRYhdKI9C7RRTS0oIQ2BTuoHzU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=lXcOECPcf2sBEUWaQK9KbMXHvLu/3bCGJs/HaH6FKwD7qzG9RDL7AAw/EopvWTVvLB1noLd2LH5Ua8/6+BEtXBLCKsKafdvchMPJbDHahjjROBB85gjmbU/OT5kCx3JcMlOC8a92UZJ3E4mluuWJDycXWbiv5i2x5JdYqG26fnjJX7bpuHTQR5fHYpGWKB63GvuU5Zg2XZ5WWJML/pvGTYMwIpq8S7OeA7DCPNUVEKK50ANMyE79wv8N8DDpJP10EIP9jy2Y2uSuGonbRt7LiqXwYAMAXPLTJJiwIKnAIsRD0mp4YObeDIcBJlstOLE2aa2dbfOFCXboqvIVV/j14Q== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1706752628; bh=KeI4IQHgOhgUeOYLXvrkGpU/1dHwtm5UeWOvdhuE9Py=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=AaSwJyMdKFBuzeILTUNo/+jBx+74N12tOUC3Dxny6aGTQ52yjWv9YRVJbCc0jXMbgq5UeWapkAWFZimx3tzJNxh42mHCSl6KsqO9RNcypaI89NmLfkXS3XrfLZO54kl/m6Blb5qz9W6qTIyXKIHiF65aJFXah8duJxp54Q7aZj0PMp30BaX/x6gGPzKIXIYKQvzJrYi2Xr8x42bRHrM4O71e6QuaW/ykYmR7RYEkNNkBX3o77D26DeUILha+2+l9pv0rA6BVdu3rfPV8Gjbbw16FzrHhCRIYFMeJLIIV32zsmue2PUXCoijtGR1iR0g6BAXzG2TWBwDPQrHrdvnkQQ== X-YMail-OSG: a1Pdu.oVM1ndgMDpJxMzg330xz8ITb64ypbQo4Dz2oF108W3VuSoF8tsi3VjSMw .1T07mlNlLZAsZwxlBAFIhjGv.t7jp00DL3P8aYZTpm2IS5rkFzVQjBr4VesEFTtK6xJp92B7vkV AbJcZzc1B7AwthJzJpzs42xiirozcZzfReBCrBNGen9vih4O7q9BqjVT0eeG8QU.v_JG0a8CcUB1 kpdGrWVsqQM4xfXTHGxona1Zhyu97YGXo6njcU8oa.yvLfKvxTplyorkwnJUJlne.zeT7yn7luCJ kLNgEy59MwnruK95bQanPzAS0LPA0DYtNeXzSgwKLVozSEjBqeO1YyBp1F5fOz8M78iB8P8jwfxB Vu7N9ll36fwSObmgrQiFdkasL_zYwV3PQQHWTbZeC_WfJvjuG.kjtDOXTbrWAa.y.BMwPhYAL6LN lXzfH63HuskUvIpGUKOeLQPe0CI2x04zL2SyqRHsqGT1IEFu5_cfsQf9PsxscDpNUFt0a_KWrG5Y xYlriG.9.Di9VokvxEG4usyGa3AKpP6Bf4kTy0l7wQhXuNkLmuUxttEmoEJ0FsukCF_a.lLupfV7 4882AYk16odQOqQfdBkeiiGIwKpb_Q7mYP2MGwiF2KwgN8Yp1lPytU5iE.OQQweZU4DGJNkC6iQn g3A9PRKMfNYOcMrDnW12VABTFEOH4T7Rxuo1hbLPAGlyjD7Urel_bbe687a2Dxm.kIWv3D0a81Di esoRseulhZpcv7q78qzgqVySHNj.HiyUljJy4.ME4uGzPNAbcgvBE4fgVElvj.46E0_NNW8OZXtl _Kvhtjrimj_rCQ7_YuzGE7dPQILTQAb1UmJ0.5Dote X-Sonic-MF: X-Sonic-ID: 96bd3f04-710c-498f-a16a-ee0dbd8482e7 Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic303.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 01:57:08 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--production-sg3-6dc75bc8fb-8hvwv (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID a395a798a3ca7dedd4618d41f9764ffd; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 01:57:05 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <86sf2d1kk4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 31 Jan 2024 19:26:03 +0200") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.22046 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:279252 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Po Lu, any comments to the patch? > > I don't mind installing this on emacs-29, if it's TRT, but the chances > for us to have another Emacs 29.x release are slim at best at this > point. So I wonder whether you should bother. I suggest cherry-picking 6c1413d5ef0d1fea639b0d8c83a0c0065d99359b instead, because the systems where this flag is required have lapsed out of existence. It can't hurt.