From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15542: 24.3.50; doc strings: cl-flet, cl-labels Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:06:00 -0800 Message-ID: <87ob2i6yfr.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <12eb23ab-078e-4761-aa3e-b4c03be15253@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391832488 16705 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 04:08:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 04:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15542@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 05:08:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzDC-0003bP-GY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:08:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44813 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzDB-0000wn-Sw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:08:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzD5-0000vi-2F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:08:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzD0-0002rV-3D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:08:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzD0-0002rQ-0L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzCz-0002LK-JB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15542 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15542-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15542.13918324458940 (code B ref 15542); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 04:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15542) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 04:07:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55871 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzCP-0002K8-6x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:07:25 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:48428) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzCM-0002Jv-Pe for 15542@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:07:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBzC8-0004fA-Ct; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:07:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <12eb23ab-078e-4761-aa3e-b4c03be15253@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 6 Oct 2013 14:13:37 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WBzC8-0004fA-Ct MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392437228.8531@ongeZiFYWELPuQagM4ohsQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84871 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > The doc strings should _describe the macros_. > And that includes specifying each parameter. I don't really see how saying that "FUNC is a function" and "ARGLIST is an argument list" really would help anybody. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/