From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19547: 25.0.50; throw-on-input "fires" when switching workspace Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:46:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87oapudv8e.fsf@web.de> References: <874ms03qj1.fsf@web.de> <87zj9r4i8d.fsf@web.de> <87sifj4e9j.fsf@web.de> <83egr36ltc.fsf@gnu.org> <87oaq6l1ea.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421722095 7168 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2015 02:48:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:48:15 +0000 (UTC) To: 19547@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 20 03:48:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YDOrT-0000wr-SE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:48:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40995 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDOrT-0007OQ-C2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:48:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDOrQ-0007O9-0G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:48:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDOrK-0000yd-Sw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:48:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDOrK-0000xZ-Pp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDOrK-0005mX-60 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:48:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19547 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19547-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19547.142172203222152 (code B ref 19547); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2015 02:47:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50167 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDOqV-0005lE-UK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:47:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:60637) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDOqU-0005kz-FC for 19547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:47:11 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.186.204.245]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lrs70-1Xk5uY1ro6-013dEG; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:47:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 10 Jan 2015 20:47:24 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ZEnfu7BMn4OPQjifjg8ESa2AMsOQIeN9bqZpC+uj/ZBCP+nKsPQ xVOYr/tn6+/yjsyxiqptksQ9E0+EQCBN4DzvUF4MYhCgeW3ONqxePLlml79YN3XqJWWHG9U OAyPhn4ktmkhVIT2vv9B9WWo8Hh6t5+pj1J1hUfbCllN69a+MZ/PlbeGZuydLh7Slwt7V2B dxy7MuGVdRSb8B7wtQSTw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98486 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > && event->kind != FOCUS_OUT_EVENT > > && event->kind != ICONIFY_EVENT > > Adding FOCUS_OUT_EVENT seems definitely safe since we already handle > FOCUS_IN_EVENT like that. As for ICONIFY_EVENT, it seems a bit more > risky, but I think we can give it a try. Eli, would that change be acceptable in your eyes?