From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18313: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:04:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87oaddryby.fsf@gnus.org> References: <7bcf083d-a0e4-4af5-a972-06661680846c@default> <83mwawmy55.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451145922 9667 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2015 16:05:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18313@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 17:05:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCrLD-00045g-2h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:05:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39028 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCrLC-0003No-Gc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:05:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37797) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCrL7-0003Mm-TU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCrL4-00045U-O6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:05:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCrL4-00045Q-Kj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCrL4-0002Wf-Eo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18313 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 18313-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18313.14511458679649 (code B ref 18313); Sat, 26 Dec 2015 16:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18313) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2015 16:04:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41582 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCrKU-0002VY-Uu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:51527) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCrKT-0002VQ-B5 for 18313@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:04:25 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aCrK6-0001Ma-OC; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:04:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83mwawmy55.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 22 Aug 2014 16:50:30 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aCrK6-0001Ma-OC MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451750643.04106@kRicVDj5skjIchsLF7PIcQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110668 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > The assertion violation is here: > > #ifdef GLYPH_DEBUG > /* Check that reference counts are indeed correct. */ > eassert (dpyinfo->reference_count == dpyinfo_refcount); <<<<<<<< > eassert ((dpyinfo->terminal->image_cache == NULL > && image_cache_refcount == 0) > || (dpyinfo->terminal->image_cache != NULL > && dpyinfo->terminal->image_cache->refcount == image_cache_refcount)); > #endif > > I guess that condition is wrong when frames are created in recursive > edit. Should this be followed up? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no