From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20960: handling /etc/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt by default in emacs Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:02:08 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87oada1bbz.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <55950B13.1040406@redhat.com> <83d20a1udy.fsf@gnu.org> <87wps1orm3.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451340205 22936 80.91.229.3 (28 Dec 2015 22:03:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20960@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 28 23:03:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aDfsn-0000ta-CX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:03:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46372 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDfsm-0005HU-Nl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:03:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46726) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDfsg-0005Go-9T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDfsc-0004xT-M6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:03:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aDfsc-0004xP-GN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDfsc-000213-5S; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20960 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20960-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20960.14513401447684 (code B ref 20960); Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20960) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2015 22:02:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46831 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDfrw-0001zi-Md for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:02:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com ([209.85.192.43]:33480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aDfrr-0001zS-U7 for 20960@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:02:19 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b35so25141405qge.0 for <20960@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 14:02:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=GEVhIKR97cldfJ+OODFB0twh+CTLUfRAQH1Q+4X4lEg=; b=SjbfotKUlLiJdvAtoXYBNTiHakn357dr8NbUKzxAi7RFzuNka2R2JvVv+QmsDIyqqM 1Zaf5/nOEEi8nytEN7bYr1n3LuxV6hslsS6chjWodJr3cg6YxezOC8jxo/ZpPlXxgtAT A1Q+2PPxVHXg+460IN08v6W04ow+R2sfQ72cI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=GEVhIKR97cldfJ+OODFB0twh+CTLUfRAQH1Q+4X4lEg=; b=Q12byoz+SnnjLuCn2SO4qkKXTF82H/2dvpMKcpqZx/2UVrMzLitXUEvq7u8bPMSgXa 80/LMck9pGe4OErVK3DmNVx00g6CGeHtOqBPdVbbMpYGyQ0kzO7LsdiFsM1o/H2fEzSv 9gEGUFsmHhzWq2W+NLX5oguowbBmC2vSaIAtDxEBP9+tzi5Acb3c9eiCNU1uHx3BtQRA Iz8Rh1QDqRO+AhZUXycioK9UIwSBFaNbYIwLAWbAy6K8dgK5T06+55cAkrCW4CIfR2YY FWnnqzKGGBEK8BzhcLCGg6YN/Gnupt5lnndUE5GoIrac5LUmjK+nbKb8k3I1HsFeptz7 9YZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnaFWzY5i3qwpJXlOc1Hwp/7QTPATAnLbSRtah5t948RZ6ItmQL7WvQpDdkuU5SBy8xiUAs6VeIbHvWtnFj+xdytjjyBQ== X-Received: by 10.140.109.100 with SMTP id k91mr74092706qgf.23.1451340130510; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 14:02:10 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from flea ([98.229.60.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z2sm27806021qhz.38.2015.12.28.14.02.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Dec 2015 14:02:09 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <87wps1orm3.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:57:24 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110930 Archived-At: On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 21:57:24 +0100 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: LI> Stefan Monnier writes: >>> that exists, similar to what gnutls-trustfiles does. (Do these two >>> variables duplicate each other?) >> >> Yes, I believe they are duplicates (with smime-CA-directory predating >> the gnutls thingy). LI> smime-CA-directory should be rewritten to use gnutls-trustfiles (if LI> gnutls-trustfiles exists). The minor complication is that the former is LI> a directory and the latter is a list of files, so it wouldn't be exactly LI> backwards compatible... We can make `gnutls-trustfiles' support directories? Ted