unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Cc: 20637@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20637: incompatible, undocumented change to vc-working-revision
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:26:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oa9cyzx2.fsf@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a0a80ab-a299-814e-1e18-68ce6e74d9f9@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:53:27 +0300")

Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:

>> And I still feel unhappy that none of the active Emacs maintainers feels
>> responsible for vc*.el.
>
> I do feel responsible, and I try to take care of most bug reports in
> that area.

I know that you do and I really appreciate this!

But since ESRs rewrite in fall 2014, there are still several
inconsistencies. Eric confirmed that in an email to me. So it's not only
bug hunting, a systematic review of the state is needed.

I've started to write systematic tests (up to my limited knowledge), and
I've asked several times in emacs-devel ML for support, but nearly no
response. That's why I'm kinda frustrated.

Well, forget my lamenting. I'm still willing to help to improve. But I
cannot do this alone, as in the past.

>> I'm trying to support fixing problems here, but
>> most of the code, and the VCSes being used, are still terra incognita for me.
>
> It would be great if the problems we're fixing were formulated like
> "VC behaves like this, and it causes that problem in practice (or
> could cause, at least)", rather than "here is a test case, and I feel
> it should pass". I think that would encourage more practical choices.

I agree that the tests shall be much more commented. But I see also the
lack of documentation and implicit design decisions (you spoke about
somewhere), which must be improved I believe.

Best regards, Michael.





  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-23 23:49 bug#20637: incompatible, undocumented change to vc-working-revision Glenn Morris
2016-03-28 23:28 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-03-29 18:13   ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-01  0:36     ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-09 19:34       ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-09 20:42         ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-10  8:00           ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-10 16:00             ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-10 18:09               ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-10 18:58                 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-11  6:55                   ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-13 20:55                     ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-14  7:10                       ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-14 13:53                         ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-14 15:26                           ` Michael Albinus [this message]
2016-04-15  0:33                             ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-15 13:13                               ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-14 15:23                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-04-13 15:14   ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-13 20:49     ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-14  7:21       ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-14 14:20         ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-14 18:31           ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-15  0:20             ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-15 13:11               ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-17  0:44                 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-18 12:27                   ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-18 12:33                     ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-18 12:46                       ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-18  1:40                 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-15  1:01             ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-15  1:04               ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-15 13:23               ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-17  0:27                 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-18  1:33             ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-18 12:28               ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-18 12:37                 ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-18 12:53                   ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-18 12:58                     ` Dmitry Gutov
2016-04-18 13:06                       ` Michael Albinus
2016-04-18 16:34                     ` John Wiegley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87oa9cyzx2.fsf@gmx.de \
    --to=michael.albinus@gmx.de \
    --cc=20637@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).