npostavs@users.sourceforge.net writes: > severity 14967 wishlist > quit > > Alex writes: > >> Stefan Monnier writes: >> >>>> Well, obviously I consider this behavior a bug. Trash is no place for >>>> deleted packages. I mean, does apt-get remove use the Trash?! >>> >>> I think the reasoning goes as follows: >>> Emacs uses "trash" when deleting a file upon the user's request (as >>> opposed to things like temp files used internally). >> >> Could there perhaps be a separate configuration option for deleting >> packages versus trashing them? I usually like Emacs using the trash, but >> I don't see a reason why packages should go there myself. > > Seems reasonable. Here's a patch for it.