From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25030: 25.1; Unexpected indentation and syntax-highlighting in `emacs-lisp-mode' Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:38:39 -0400 Message-ID: <87o9jgsukw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <868taptb26.fsf@gmail.com> <87efkftyez.fsf@gmail.com> <86in9rmw6h.fsf@gmail.com> <87a7v3trww.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1521686237 1191 195.159.176.226 (22 Mar 2018 02:37:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 02:37:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25030@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 22 03:37:13 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyq6K-0000CO-B2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:37:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58498 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyq8M-0001RR-0I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:39:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48243) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyq8B-0001QN-RN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyq87-0005y4-0C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:39:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38621) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eyq86-0005xi-RW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyq86-0004yb-EY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 02:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25030 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 25030-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25030.152168633019109 (code B ref 25030); Thu, 22 Mar 2018 02:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25030) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2018 02:38:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46518 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyq7t-0004y4-M3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:38:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f52.google.com ([209.85.214.52]:34380) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eyq7s-0004xm-2v; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 22:38:48 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f52.google.com with SMTP id z7-v6so366378iti.1; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:38:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=20FQm3tQvB8Lt1zfeC1gRdr3cPqoKehaA5sLL5TIozU=; b=UCmLYC0H83PfUPofCXAxs2dqOKkZUtMzLHq44gek4w26LH8AZcWkZKGvHl2v0lU6Oc jMmfUvEr2Z9CoSw8VEFpeSzKyxwdoqMpmhEopZU/FrFgrjxqPEgH9YzzPhDcxoppjFBe 2HJp7yEuC/kbm7cpyAIJPAhcJCCUdlK+AEieeEitYA8/zfaC2Pq0u2i7tH17JjWdEOmi tPq2byWRWxwj8aYZyou72Aw5Ot9v+zS6llRWAieJSzglwGTNfJJkbhL+f0DPnUv8LZCr 4Ky3KIuyUDRklevj1/dE0owhs/8oVBt1W5n5P2q0cKpQ2lNWq3Z04XyRf1lZwtlDmrdg lI2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=20FQm3tQvB8Lt1zfeC1gRdr3cPqoKehaA5sLL5TIozU=; b=W3Gq2sZNoWIEUjQYAW1H/sbLHxj9xBbPju5/vFEDra6KCHpzKOdMZZ8394yQTUV7gA ldYobNyQdTKAuSHny0IGByJITE0cfgHN49N43tHBu7dXF00B5kWXW4515GarVLtfZ7xJ aU/E/8bJFgfT4C5gGwGG+UzLlGmjE1bL3RDT0eN53ITg3vP4IpjiPOG4BO/LnqCDPVf6 hL0mjgilUoJwJc1uCzAWJrLDZ7J2zSpwQ8PhVVhyWJuTUxTGQi1aIqiEWfngbma7IWHM V9qdhWnLV1vGCetRaamAiQMjVlxDJXacsYPx1OFKxDfl3883gMn+Ttec9L8jMVuc3/hm DK+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FgGQoNxtjg+1IgZOCLoOCFojiBk7EQ5BvQjIxaS+TmLQH/Wya/ 8evTbuBbs5MTEUuKVrrXW//Hqg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuLsW7APcjqBR3F5rB2v4Y6XIxgxsZk3fX3tfKc0GbWjukGFrevsl4bBys5C+U2GVnr3S58Rg== X-Received: by 2002:a24:e085:: with SMTP id c127-v6mr6625792ith.25.1521686322122; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e142-v6sm4241700ite.3.2018.03.21.19.38.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Mar 2018 19:38:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Andy Moreton's message of "Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:55:48 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:144514 Archived-At: retitle 25030 elisp: highlighting of unexpected indentation should use separate face from highlight of error functions severity 25030 wishlist tags 25030 = reopen 25030 quit Andy Moreton writes: > The point is that the unusual code layout does not cause any problems for > elisp code, and it does not matter if the code is interpreted or > byte-compiled: the result is the same, namely that indentation style has > no effect on the meaning of the code. This seems like an argument against the byte compiler emitting style warnings, but since this bug is not about byte compiler warnings, I don't understand why you are bringing it up.