From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35497: [PATCH v4] Don't rewrite buffer contents after saving by rename Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 09:52:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87o94k7z6a.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87ftpx5b33.fsf@gmx.de> <20190502220649.129146-1-jktomer@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="29663"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35497@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jonathan Tomer Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 03 23:20:35 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hMfbI-0017On-VW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 23:20:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36167 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMT0Q-0003xL-6B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 03:53:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMT0F-0003wW-1C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 03:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMT0D-0003tp-16 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 03:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMT0A-0003sI-01 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 03:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMT09-0000Yx-Pj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 03:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20190429232009.94549-1-jktomer@google.com> Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 07:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 35497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35497.15568699482125 (code B ref 35497); Fri, 03 May 2019 07:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2019 07:52:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47619 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMSzc-0000YC-8u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 03:52:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:53999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMSzZ-0000Xz-Qo for 35497@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 03:52:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1556869937; bh=gva+ibIrRpNrAF7r80V6GKQfNoO0TOY3SDesyZj7Rs0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date; b=CN8S/m2qaw/dXsROmdckUA7oNv4uAjEpOaLaHbk3mXFUniEb4XXam4hebnXGpm04Q n1oyPF1+TAmTcpO24zNj6phsXsvpaSIFecqR0Kum2CnskLYr6uJsbd5yP7mabftzYM lZc1fO5SXKRWhbBmelxChOOpP3e41B6rZswHUPIs= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([213.220.157.162]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LymjL-1git7P3SyN-0167mq; Fri, 03 May 2019 09:52:16 +0200 X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:rg85MbgcTxZBZvwongPK390jFX9tHz9cFxCR2ifAlnduBIwdp8S k3I/bzyk90me9+fh3owBPQsRPt51LKWAWtmXuZbe6p4qCOsezAM1Oe+dqSJU9aDd2WvCBdb 8h9iZIkKBExMRLxFpHhWU5MQdX2FZxOM7m0UkoAfauKR2Q/4kxbraw+boW+T1BEN1gp+Cdw 6V+39OSdzThLp28QWzopw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:FDQC8TkPcSs=:bNvd33VMfMPjrU8ohjqTE9 1hhiti/aRuuqUOtAiM5E9h11LeMP94V4yYr37Kir2ZHZghZvA/xu6ZeV2rRsLD1OgbO8iCQsC jUpXIhcVj3h1TOhnZt63sxvpQFae5qiZfZxAmF+54B4p5G4B2KRSUbczyqt55jYEjdG7uu30U 8IiYr7ptra/9dm4hZ5NY2G6NUwJ8tamBSjBcyok2crNg8DbyzI8HO0j3kFnjUq7Bgm7J1n0dO ooteZl6EiW5T4qWsKpqjmPYNcxTOisHmoSNRKYHrySWhv0eSMl7kXj/4CRlD23XWa9M60tCLr W2FLDGIcXU3eXGS5D9FeTRnGbU3YImUPnDwIZ+PRXNgNSil7ytH1fLQCMuEEB6lN9z30hXrqN qLUywLufebxfrD+bR1eaQBwZufLM87O5KEJuMeNGaKPn66UucOgJyAvAFaZuJwhh37Qi89cro feE82ZmQzvmbdisaqqPIsMHaW+dYcZ8hUBR435VkuE4nTnKUTHxW7MncRAFKcTeo2Z3sYEsMg TbKwYH43rxb5RQ8W/BAx4LhWydf7VMy2UX6sO+TJaXWc9IgLI8Bjzn8viLiVe0SGGlTqjvtaH bmOBsH4zmyBmxuKYZFKNrNfeUDER4EkE6T6g5FU63ARfeWibk6pQ8TX/YYbJzbKm8Iw88fTmG RE8m0s9VgT14uUL8NW/A4fAUGbEFMKNq73Qj+lgKkILxkgSsw1gJAnIxGRXDs+GuZawC4wUPo fw1Bniz/w2IjuOFQAbKVpHtKSa//ashxUf+JCpaTLvA0PzQ4LcL4hHLzRG3KSraMGS+3emSN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158724 Archived-At: Jonathan Tomer writes: Hi Jonathan, I still get an error with the Tramp test: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Test tramp-test10-write-region-file-precious-flag condition: (file-error "Copying directly failed, see buffer `*tramp/mock detlef*' for details.") FAILED 2/2 tramp-test10-write-region-file-precious-flag (0.995086 sec) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- You might keep it as it is, but mark it unstable: > +(ert-deftest tramp-test10-write-region-file-precious-flag () > + "Check that `file-precious-flag' is respected with Tramp in use." > + :tags '(:unstable) I will check then what's up. Looks to me like you haven't signed yet the FSF papers. This is necessary to contribute to Emacs. Are you willing to sign them? You could read about this at . Best regards, Michael.