From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22457: 24.5; [PATCH] `dired-mark-if' should not count non-changes Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:47:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87o92lmgez.fsf@web.de> References: <2a6ff247-2b75-4f85-9a4c-889576ed7b34@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="27752"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 22457@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 26 00:53:17 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hfuJQ-00071t-Vm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:53:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35640 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfuJQ-0002Wo-0O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50147) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfuJF-0002Wg-Cu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfuJD-00064z-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48482) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hfuJB-00062t-PV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfuJB-0008Tr-NF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 22:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22457 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 22457-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22457.156150315632551 (code B ref 22457); Tue, 25 Jun 2019 22:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22457) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2019 22:52:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33793 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfuIj-0008Su-9T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:52:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:37213) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hfuIh-0008Se-7E for 22457@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 18:52:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1561503142; bh=tWwhPuz9FeN6ceoXVtBA/evRWlPGPYZQm1I/av/lfs4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=icTOndTQutq9HR0mujMOT3L7rJD4/6g9MhAN4dO9lx/gSuZIg1lCWJVlLAmIsXkN8 RXslNWWLZzbR+C+ma7bR3lVZsBGjo31S4ls7eVEv/9rEhUt4bK6jdCrwJC3713t93R 4JoXcVTkbvemF8DMUcSAB3xDyMswTUYY8N2GJTIs= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.184.73]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MgfFr-1hu0xO1vZ1-00O0dt; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:47:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 25 Jun 2019 17:44:33 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:FvEE7Pbbum3h33dx7pHzYK237wY40UhxMGsd95aRx0yOlekLjEt RPWrovjo6H0f5EiSPH2DqFLV+A+fkecXCwj7tBv0ffoqpUNNgLwSuk3zH7bDtMK2fWAlYQj ziOQeCEgsEL+jiXOXy5Ic0cdPXVNAOdWv8DPWLZu/2bSaerGIU1r7SmALZ//FbUrvYiQt23 O0apkIdxLnkGphV5g1kwQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:+kRyhOwqd9w=:qm978erya/1NtS0OU7C4ES 8114uy/b5NJ6XyOOMvfuYYt57kbvkUBL7EIUNjniURaQ3ff7j1zr/CjUI7IVtTYwllIvO1/Lw rOVIQNT+N0u2jzaZ4Z8iWP2T+pMPPsdMtonqIpH5g2mtYQbNdHQgseSTJkyP/9wysub40mvBx fZQt8yLXSCfqxp1z9D8AtOnITerEQzg2syZ+YxPpuDUJyACe3tY97fGYzMN+gxqinRUw0vOnN 76omnW8LsE822wGeO8uMQek/x1esZabTivs3kET6YH/noBWxVAeoUcGpY8i9w0w6+eDcFMH7K T6cFTRZb/8ppfVsnju+rZYznAxLtWu9v6eYmadu1/MU8ewF+WS66PYk/ef8MDG7ptwosrQeZ7 nEauqJq9xLvV9zTU64q7aVOpaCLs37R1Q65EwlE41tTEo5Zt8ryCOe9bU11QxaKSY8AeqFy3Y zusU13wQCuwmJJYI7sfsSlSyQhyPdW4mGeCz2omELQJo3b272zipQnDgMAQ5gCXJ+zom/LPWc qvzSjTapMztreoCGxupdy0InjeRD9WVJ6aySmrFc4Pa+H3Nzu2OPBtOokqQmSMoFf3FBxTVmv e4z0MroCd8wy4NhP6kjRrEZEq2QbLNw7IV2QKqmdHIVYBMYsDAzwoL7YK84NMv8+9O+SipQr4 EvN+dbEc0rRt+1/PDq8vHJPr/TI9iOk6eoRaIwtUq3ImUF5gw0uQxjOqIfVQxxIkJLR5x2dks D9mc3UiIwVsOYKt+6ieGqUis/r+v9W4cqW/PW1Xmy++CfvKhrzg0l8UZY48Wm7EdPEwG8iRb X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161437 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > -- > *** The marking commands now report how many files were marked by the > command itself, not how many files are marked in total. > -- I don't think this exactly describes what the patch changed: it is not about new vs total marks, but about marks of files that were already marked before, right? > Perhaps somebody will want to weigh in here; feel free to revert the > commit if this is felt to be a confusing change. IIUC: Maybe we could add to the summary message something like "(N already were marked)" or so if a command finds existent marks on files to be marked? That might be useful information, even independent from this change, because it might also be a hint for a pilot error. Michael.