From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36598: 26.1; (error "=?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98/tmp/emacs1000=E2=80=99?= is not a safe directory because it is a symlink") Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:07:08 -0400 Message-ID: <87o91lvtsj.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87muhkr79y.fsf@silk.nichework.com> <87k1cmwnu6.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <44a502116d2c0568d120b7328913b26a@russet.org.uk> <20a62c04ad67dc64665b32d7a31cfe8b@russet.org.uk> <83tvbjyi0n.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="255366"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: mah@everybody.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, 36598@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, Stefan Monnier To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 23 14:08:09 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hptaR-0014Ev-0V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:08:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41954 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hptaP-0007yT-RP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36181) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hptaM-0007y8-VT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hptaL-0002lg-V2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53539) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hptaL-0002lZ-RQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:08:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hptaL-0006sl-LW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:08:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36598 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36598-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36598.156388364026409 (code B ref 36598); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36598) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jul 2019 12:07:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34127 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hptZf-0006rn-P0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:07:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com ([209.85.166.67]:42285) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hptZd-0006rU-4K; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:07:17 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id e20so50870325iob.9; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 05:07:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=JwtDaIrsCpNZxzzS90sKFoFXVhgTslxEGMvdzMg1sxc=; b=l7+UY6hY4mU11CPZhfJTR6qIMoVR5vbXGjebbFlAlm32PUCf77sQG2D1YRKajPvirz hj19XW0PXvs6gWAGgmzmf0MnDgN5YZpQW7H4dzlM3dzOB7jEK1w2YwpHumMz8HqnCEOg XAkvArQyIVHcVYqCii4oVZlS71DjHgdYnbrWEzzGrPpRo/0X5dz/EYuYkvGczqTxRIlt vIdFCOBtmKXZggG92dGw7zMcKoUq7JVPUM5HUqQrXMZk88Hmg3OO36xk0iy6fEGDCsM0 C/DKvDELNiJWNytyrAlNNRvrx9NBvH+BNvxBj6xxVdvMR7r9GtFeKT1D/5HiAaZoE1Mn VvFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=JwtDaIrsCpNZxzzS90sKFoFXVhgTslxEGMvdzMg1sxc=; b=gEm2BkXVteR2jXI3v4rOuxBZjrgjYZSbdFvLTzrJAlfhTWw/TR8IrrmjCQmE6A8jd7 8xQVtG76hIopLK/HbVAvMt+C/nPcDJ/ugTz+qgSjm28OWiOE+Djmz9e1cxScYWiK+qPr iCe5lvIRS7yeB0t3TDGJKJHBt4bnJrK0Htl2NiwqOLhIZ2UQkYo2WXVsIZJa8/tRNCAI eYIaSurUDrKkBHnXZB1z+9OIH0ECKxDCurfXPdbf0phzx1mgkNxWBAf+BZiBucIBrNu9 CfsMVpS1mq3vpRulRsGIL2IeoTtZTOlZycxN0EbQR9HDleQOPbDWE5KnAiydC9HxBFw3 rWHw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUm/taZ1ayn9to9w6FTu0IjDPj5HEMWgOLtlJzrHaQRO6uLLRj nDTCb8JCiSnY50AT403ssFjh24Ul X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxNRCEiNGRwNaLZv/Mk2s7jPqk3PTPBOWb6nDN+yrGR5VuHwMJe/DBnvD2owqIh+tQLJaVjwA== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:2b08:: with SMTP id r8mr27158392ior.34.1563883631419; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 05:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b20sm34331067ios.44.2019.07.23.05.07.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 05:07:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83tvbjyi0n.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:27:20 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:163628 Archived-At: tags 36598 fixed close 36598 quit Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> Commit b663c837249 (in May) which says "Cosmetic changes" is the one >> >> that introduced this code? >> >> And instead of making things work with an old emacsclient, it breaks the >> >> Emacs 26 emacsclient? >> > >> > Nearly. I think it breaks emacs-26 not the emacsclient. I haven't check the >> > emacsclient code, but I guess Stefan was >> > aiming for the situation when someone is using (say) emacsclient-26 with >> > emacs-27. >> >> Indeed (it's Debian/s /usr/bin/emacsclient accessing my hand-built >> Emacs-27 server). >> >> >> Stefan, was this checked in by mistake? >> >> Definitely, > > If this mistake adversely affects the release branch, please revert > that commit. We will have RC1 soon. It has been reverted, closing the bug. 8a2f763e5c 2019-07-18T11:10:05-04:00 "* lisp/server.el (server-ensure-safe-dir): Revert part of b663c8372495" https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=8a2f763e5cc0ed5b5eecd6a315ac45310bc7a2dd