From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25649: 26.0.50; Decryption of mail fails silently if tmp directory is full Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:24:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8zb2d6t.fsf@gnus.org> References: <84zihxhkom.fsf@tm6592> <87v9tj2e46.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="210083"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25649@debbugs.gnu.org To: Marco Wahl Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 23 18:25:34 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCR9Y-000sRQ-4e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:25:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59298 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCR9V-0001pH-Pv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:25:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCR95-0001oq-Sh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCR94-0004C7-OF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56290) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCR94-0004Bw-L0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCR94-0000jV-Ew for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25649 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 25649-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25649.15692558782776 (code B ref 25649); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25649) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2019 16:24:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36876 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCR8f-0000ih-O1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:24:37 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:39732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCR8b-0000iK-1Q for 25649@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:24:33 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCR8U-0000hT-Jv; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:24:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87v9tj2e46.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:04:25 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167015 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > And mm-security-handle indeed has a file-related error message after > this. But it's just discarded? I mean, it's bound locally and then not > returned, so I think there's a thinko here somewhere... I've now made it check the results and pass the errors on to the caller. Hopefully this doesn't break other use cases -- I'm not very confident that this won't fail for some of the decryption methods. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no