Finally got around to try out rmc.el.

A brief recap of the issue: dired-do-shell-command looks out for any
non-isolated metacharacters[1], and prompts the user when it finds some.
The problem is that the prompt is downright misleading under some
circumstances.  E.g. after marking some files in a Dired buffer:

    ! sed 's/?/!/g' RET
    => Confirm--do you mean to use `?' as a wildcard?

The answer a user must input to proceed is "yes", despite '?' not being
a wildcard in this situation; the answer some users may give intuitively
is "no" (or, in my case, "whaaa?").


This patch series initially tried to shove the command in the prompt,
highlight the non-isolated characters, and re-phrase the prompt to be
more accurate (i.e. not talk about wildcards).

It went through a several iterations for a few reasons[2]; most recently
Michael suggested using read-multiple-choice [bug#35564#136]; I looked
at how nsm.el uses it, saw that is was good, and got distracted for two
months.

Here is the new series: