From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3179: Entering Chinese "zero": add U+3007 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:09:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87o8yjavbc.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r5z8vgp1.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <87my9wvf0r.fsf@jidanni.org> <87eezga3oy.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2xnb72s.fsf@gmail.com> <87r23fw1jk.fsf@gnus.org> <87tv8bawfr.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnizt59w.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="141187"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 3179@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 14 23:10:17 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iK7bc-000aeK-W2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:10:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57730 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iK7bb-0005lM-Su for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:10:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iK7bQ-0005in-7B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:10:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iK7bP-0005Qf-7B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iK7bP-0005QS-41 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK7bO-0003My-T3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 3179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 3179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B3179.157108736312876 (code B ref 3179); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2019 21:09:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK7al-0003Lc-Hn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:09:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com ([209.85.128.47]:54445) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iK7ah-0003LE-Ak for 3179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:09:22 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id p7so18619448wmp.4 for <3179@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:09:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xTjYh7ZjF1kwh1cNXYxXnEhErvIeaqfr4sqL4GMvNuQ=; b=bznT6S5Y1KiZga1JPCLjzIZJMP2StGwa4iu/eOFe6mCLH5DixR5Q8L+f8pIZtcCCRN yPFrCS7AlZrqrXeBujnUncsP3MAvvEsVMDvcp92I+STM9ZCjmeuPiAaPqEC0ix2HfdQD kkKzAfo5TvbeOZbddeagbKKZSudEUilgKleknkzok0Zu/8Ahp5jQRarZzVzsayLDefCI NQr69Dg9z2cLyJ0YiGs1grcyhV6kj1VynFdpbS996A3Jay+5lQuJYVt7QQgpkDsIr+8l xJw2dUh0W9Z5SXf132Ee3wGD1cwtjwWLe6DOmXo8KHpufFgN4pt1hbyIpCzNhyEjq7qe 6aHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xTjYh7ZjF1kwh1cNXYxXnEhErvIeaqfr4sqL4GMvNuQ=; b=X9KRYOdCnMSPSmlxKNjj4uVv/dO0IkBfX1+NowtZzdvnHEwDMSgw30WkCyd3E81vF/ 6m/jvQirIw86dlsyUPEBrRhHBFvFOpFWANAwBPaht3VdYMWk/1sgyTIEZ1QNLFnMUvZS /MJhLIzAmJqSV1gy+G2bEZALlvptIx5mZxlJ+OZFTWUOXptRG2NnM+RZ5Sh4P+sfTWwo x9uWT4XSNmVsyXJ90Gs3HmZwb1B75ll8gRkYTOuUOZMPkqoI67IQ013kkG7ZJMFEjVwQ uo4zObx5jUwTIoFmsqhC0+O/RlNRlEjC9w9Phdk3IP9QaZOSRSdto5DPHIVUly7jUeoD VwcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUfL1l5lf6TLF8QN4LXUI+Gwn9nqqNdgIs2dPJq+B3cT48plIe9 TqSipeXmlYirVlemZreikrQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyO7XOiLLmvdNdOQn+a1y4sCaNyJ13m0n1awh6zhPPRJSbcIOHd+fOVEsF4KMWXbmgkVfP+LQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c7d4:: with SMTP id z20mr16152936wmk.135.1571087352499; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([185.112.167.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v7sm17480315wrr.4.2019.10.14.14.09.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:09:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87pnizt59w.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169325 Archived-At: On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:56:43 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > But there's also > > (eval-after-load "quail/PY-b5" > '(quail-defrule "ling2" ?=E2=97=8B nil t)) > > in leim-list.el... That's auto-added from leim-ext by 'make'. > And why are these things added anyway? The other ling2 things > (whatever they are) don't have these entries? I don't know why this particular addition is done this way, instead of adding it to the py-b5 definition directly. Maybe it was supposed to be more modular in case same thing would go in multiple similar input methods? Only Handa-san knows I guess... That's not the only strange thing about leim/quail in general and leim-ext in particular, but I didn't want to go there. (I just checked for other occurences of WHITE CIRCLE vs IDEOGRAPHIC ZERO, and tested my change.) --=20 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n