From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38035: 27.0.50; Trivial errors in process filters can render Emacs unusable Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 19:38:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87o8xucee9.fsf@gnus.org> References: <874kzmdv0q.fsf@gnus.org> <83pniai0rw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="48775"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 38035@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 02 19:39:44 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyJM-000Ca9-Ge for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 19:39:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49910 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyJK-0003Ez-Tr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:39:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55415) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyIk-00036U-50 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyIi-00087X-Kb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyIg-00085t-PS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyIg-0003gm-Ke for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 18:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38035 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38035-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38035.157271990814106 (code B ref 38035); Sat, 02 Nov 2019 18:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38035) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2019 18:38:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33097 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyI7-0003fR-U3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:38:28 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:59188) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyI6-0003fK-9Y for 38035@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:38:26 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyI2-0005UE-Vt; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 19:38:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83pniai0rw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 02 Nov 2019 20:36:03 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170839 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Yes, see read_process_output_error_handler (it's actually 2-sec > sleep), and read_and_dispose_of_process_output, where we set up for > calling the process filter. Ah, right. > I'd suggest to count the number of times a process filter errors out, > and disable it after some configurable number. Doing that on the > first error sounds too drastic: it could be a one-time spurious error. Good idea. Perhaps something time-based -- if it errors out at a rate that would make Emacs unusable (so more than, say, ten errors per minute (configurable), would disable the filter)? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no