From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dima Kogan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49954: 28.0.50; TRAMP: cannot kill child processes: "Forbidden reentrant call of Tramp" Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:39:21 -0700 Message-ID: <87o88uisee.fsf@secretsauce.net> References: <875ywf9ea7.fsf@secretsauce.net> <871r72ssqi.fsf@gmx.de> <874kby7wn5.fsf@secretsauce.net> <875ywdquds.fsf@gmx.de> <87pmtfjyw4.fsf@secretsauce.net> <878s03s3t1.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22182"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 28.0.50 Cc: 49954@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 15 02:40:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mQIyV-0005Wb-T6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 02:40:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53246 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQIyT-0002GW-Ow for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:40:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQIy2-0002EY-7f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38896) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQIy1-0004uK-VY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQIy1-0001ab-N3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:40:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dima Kogan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 00:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49954 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49954-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49954.16316663596052 (code B ref 49954); Wed, 15 Sep 2021 00:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49954) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2021 00:39:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50442 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQIxK-0001ZY-O7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:39:18 -0400 Original-Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:38187) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mQIxI-0001ZL-Kp for 49954@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:39:17 -0400 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA285C01EB; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:39:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:39:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secretsauce.net; h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm1; bh=r/mkeP1T3Ls5l8xrGtZCN2KpzO OCTolYuPOgzAguXss=; b=k1lmDAjM/dCKPjNd6/R/fZ9mO037+eo5VNLDRUk2Hw 6qkwLNAFvGZFnP0G+vzOxukUGdsBdEne330qtwhbtk99cvHjupbkSPBk8agFewMW GpLKsT+tcgFSrRqwgpircUJnWf6Ljij1p6C6IW+qdIj5skbMGfEgjScTkksMVSWJ oApOKkdFB4w3iL1uRlmUfGMir/fisKxP6oTk2zVi2lMCCVqOrhoiA7yqIo2cpLfZ cQEfDtwjiv3PSnCQZwT/UkkfjqZVgYmItNAb2CCgW8kXzK7GwRRs5MJ0TUnbXGCo PGGDHE07VRbBBp84s8VxRWPbbGozsXb/8jLdboJupbyg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=r/mkeP 1T3Ls5l8xrGtZCN2KpzOOCTolYuPOgzAguXss=; b=eXW1/+elLn8mPvLljP6ON6 ijVbG86ZH8Gnmp7kXmdgjxYslCkpFw41/u9vX9cCs0f5+2rQxIZYHSLUu03tOJ53 dZYClKI8I/jdTELeUqDSqP/k8rPQ9/0ULQCCpnzWAEKy5XGnrP4Fpxx8kXTSsj8x AlF4V6/ZEeuYNKX8tqwmr0Ehz+QLRlxU9BoribJI7qe0ZB+svZJKcyngkPbXCB1v cNV3LjdEKXQZrojjvJzerw8Z55d/LgAb0P7YQhSndFS9YYV/mny/1xIllZ9Yna0/ EhBHYfAsFAYu0Zfx3QCULqIBv7L/i0ZqzMHPZq8iUZ/fJ9jqWXMC29MMA78+utmw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudehtddgfeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfhgfhffvufgjfffkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpeffihhmrgcu mfhoghgrnhcuoeguihhmrgesshgvtghrvghtshgruhgtvgdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeevfefgtedtfedvtefgkedvtdffvefhveellefhjeehlefgudfftdeiudeu keehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepug himhgrsehsvggtrhgvthhsrghutggvrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 20:39:10 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <878s03s3t1.fsf@gmx.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:214353 Archived-At: Thanks for the explanation. What would be an example of an asynchronous process? I have several remote 'M-x shell' buffers and probably some dired buffers looking at remote directories. Is each 'M-x shell' child an "asynchronous process" for the purposes of this issue? Does it make sense to you that disabling caching fixes it? Usually, I can C-c in "M-x shell" just fine. When this bug is triggered, though, I cannot C-c in remote M-x shell processes at all: it fails each time. Disabling the caching, getting one successful C-c, and re-enabling it makes it work that time and in the future. Is this consistent with the failure mechanism you're thinking of? Thanks