From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51523: 29.0.50; gnus-mime-view-part-externally very slow Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:19:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87o873rdyx.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87v91dmcyz.fsf@gnus.org> <7b7f5641fcf9629c6074@heytings.org> <875ytcwxp7.fsf@gnus.org> <6abcac838b0dd46d94cf@heytings.org> <87sfwgvi73.fsf@gnus.org> <6abcac838bc0f53a0f78@heytings.org> <6abcac838bb83b0904d7@heytings.org> <6abcac838b7f89ee4e21@heytings.org> <831r3zncow.fsf@gnu.org> <6abcac838b521de77925@heytings.org> <83zgqnlt7t.fsf@gnu.org> <87y267revf.fsf@gnus.org> <83v91blrux.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17577"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 51523@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 01 18:20:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhazN-0004PO-Md for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:20:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50372 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhazM-0005si-PZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:20:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhaya-000577-20 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52683) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mhayY-0007cW-Og for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhayY-0000WP-3Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 17:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51523 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 51523-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51523.16357871591947 (code B ref 51523); Mon, 01 Nov 2021 17:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51523) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2021 17:19:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhaxr-0000VK-AB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:19:19 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52296) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mhaxo-0000V2-FH for 51523@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:19:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=M8Gx6WLimXpnHDSzNh4nSF0eRMTBQzgdhj39vcBgIRg=; b=VW30IMR/Lzsq06u6JB7HI7S0vZ hbG8gWOg7NJ79UtWnDmrcm/uuz3lorzb6UlMKT7zt2Fzn7h81wdNcnwpyOSDxsCVTOuSQ1BIANWdZ fnIKMkfPuJu5VdSmsBO+Cw30hA60qnoMSkHD6xeOq6HGlNlg7D1kklz9U0cstNQfY/J8=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mhaxb-00075c-UG; Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:19:08 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEX29vasoqWET2VA HzH///8iXeIbAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+ULAREAGEu5J/QAAAHCSURBVDjLhVSLseMw CJTkBiTRgIEGDPTf260+tpP37uaYySTDol2+Sem/1obVf/hhP/3cRCWEG3/7e1NX1u6Sz09/rqpO LN3CyqcOk5OqiHLI+UGWm8ML3SbS/eNJIxNbISp2PSqZ1eX+rez9BsrB+kR1U765kOoUXMVJ8B3F sh501J3TwbLLz52XgtSc8plFN1BoMSW9EDW56pZYTFWjDh1y24BrRY0LIEvFfAPmo/iWYuZUs2+R PgDMKAtykF5TLCB3t5QLPgEqrfjQAgh9Ohi9irhS4JuIN3Clw6JlDwcIQDeAbAnRxeCNyF8AhLmz DqBVklnhAkJaZ4oKIAF4XiDSBS9QLL9UEAcAyLVwiyerLrYBBIEMwFvgSCtiyMO3C1y9msAwsNy9 mt29gdFP2yPE1tYx1rntKKDYngcUOV5zigdwoxcwvfcHaUWHqjKNgBZ6bxy7XhGnnmRHGInf19NI vUySGA/8WbjBdW4VI1TxrPupHk2nv4Tae4flEPWG42iYuz5M4DpVNLi1Hq72XMHYoOI6qQJd/LpO DE8c5yxxfl96qcjKkQP3+gWgiV1iDP6HHwiP7v72z7X+/U/yF/sDl8VRaG1JfxkAAAAldEVYdGRh dGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMTEtMDFUMTc6MDA6MjQrMDA6MDBRT+z9AAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlm eQAyMDIxLTExLTAxVDE3OjAwOjI0KzAwOjAwIBJUQQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Electrelane's _No Shouts No Calls_: "In Berlin" In-Reply-To: <83v91blrux.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 01 Nov 2021 19:15:34 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:218775 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > But the real answer to that question is to compare the contents, not > file's attributes. Testing attributes is an approximation, and once > we are using an approximation, it is legitimate to ask when it's okay > for the approximation to fail. The doc string clearly says that it's about the file's modification time. > Basically, comparing time stamps is what Make does, and Make doesn't > care about the time stamp becoming older. So why should we? I don't see why we should care what Make does. > And if by "I want" you mean Gnus, then maybe we should name this > function gnus-has-mailcap-file-changed-p, and stop pretending that it > has more general use? It's not a Gnus function, and the first instance of its use is not in Gnus, but in mailcap. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no