From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:03:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87o81u3za4.fsf@igel.home> References: <87bkxu8k7t.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87bkxu8k7t.fsf@yahoo.com> <83wngiba3j.fsf@gnu.org> <874k3m8grb.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pmmauwtp.fsf@gmail.com> <87y20y6ypi.fsf@yahoo.com> <83pmmab53s.fsf@gnu.org> <871qyq5hea.fsf@igel.home> <83mtheb2s9.fsf@gnu.org> <87wngi41jg.fsf@igel.home> <83lewyb0zy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17591"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.92 (gnu/linux) Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, rpluim@gmail.com, 54562@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 25 15:08:41 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkcL-0004QJ-Bq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:08:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43778 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkcJ-0006ny-V5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:08:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkXq-0001Pd-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkXq-0003Fy-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkXq-0002tp-BJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54562.164821700011091 (code B ref 54562); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2022 14:03:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51954 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkXA-0002sp-JZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:03:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:52525) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXkX8-0002sg-IX for 54562@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:03:19 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KQ3hj3rnzz1s75G; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:03:17 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KQ3hj1Jw0z1qqkJ; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:03:17 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UrVEjlgVUMpx; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:03:16 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: QFj+g8M2kNgKSWK7d6X9lz3lbtIJ0duT8rx0PGRONE0CXQVGoQ8jMNAegT7VC85r Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-175-177.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.175.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:03:16 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83FC22C3A01; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:03:15 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: I demand IMPUNITY! In-Reply-To: <83lewyb0zy.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 25 Mar 2022 16:44:17 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:228941 Archived-At: On Mär 25 2022, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, rpluim@gmail.com, 54562@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 14:14:27 +0100 >> >> On Mär 25 2022, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > By which composition rule? Isn't that because U+20E3 is a combining >> > character? >> >> Sure. If Emacs were able to do that even if the default does not >> contain U+20E3 that would be ideal. Or if Emacs were able to combine a >> and U+0308 even if the latter is not avaliable in the default font. > > I think Emacs only considers the font of the base character when it > tries to compose? I guess that's the difference between Emacs and other display engines. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."