From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48377: 27.1; pixel-scroll-mode is unusable with popular modelines Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:05:52 +0800 Message-ID: <87o7xvxeyn.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <87y1wzsojx.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Po Lu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18772"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: Rudi C , 48377@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 12 04:07:43 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oB5JO-0004fi-T8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 04:07:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35130 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oB5JN-0006ic-FC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 22:07:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oB5In-0006gM-Py for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 22:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oB5Ij-0006x6-Vo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 22:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oB5Ij-0002Eq-Qg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 22:07:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Po Lu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 02:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48377 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48377-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48377.16575915708536 (code B ref 48377); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 02:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48377) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2022 02:06:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41309 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oB5Hu-0002Dc-1K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 22:06:10 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic302-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.186.146]:44347) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oB5Hs-0002Cv-4I for 48377@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 22:06:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1657591562; bh=uGZptfrdo97Fsm9J3luU0By9IgJDJAQYzAOkZeaNXkg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=WFOT6YKfFSj33AapNkichW/XreiFjaXHAGs8EX04LAtGGLQ7GrzrT5iamG+OUVZs/b4VmZ2fBN/aZElmIPbdiUkOD5nBjdyWFgt64iQRCSzwJLceYLu8872S6ct6JS7Wi4zlqWkNxE8YV75nHT+pdMWSomS5erngSc79DnHkfvXtqavs9v7hQ/up+cl7IhRg0SNEGRxyCjcqPibVzE6tiCbqTZgXpbSoj8JIgOUfjXU4oSQCUJQkOXzKUWch42kv7NJPDmA5b6E/pddQjYPsPfIkd2mDtAhYaSqBIBd86w82tazbBzmxrRnzNGo2mx59GHQkk/gHVmVG0S40ECKoAw== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1657591562; bh=rG8Ay8uNJhIoccGRtjbwDeXZlqzc/3lrImomhv8I/ON=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=GqU7KOIxADL6N7Yyfto4SO3Cu1yLL1/u4ETerykUGSGW22Hjm3dFwQle5u4ySYMxCl8d3qFAkp/3nbOoaELnXxdRdYCXrrv58n1CUs9i8nujSk2J3Eh1En8k/H3LkpWIYPWbMC+PtYPVck3BIwbwduADV6GiOV9ixNG9s6AzMOhJX6dhNnP2HYyTlLtB3zGArbM/bUNmb41OY14RGSdNiiQ8bvpFsOIKdxhLR9FQVh5pDH4Q6rW4zgz2qbyCPjeq0J5HTnkPwIqIKPfZzvG09Qj7aNOzgkKHOy3G2yfz3ihB1LHS4vdjjt0jq23W8r/0cwCye6LAbVmQp9DDXyEl8A== X-YMail-OSG: 3FieAYQVM1k8vvR8MDMPgL.6LNfMfafzvNcWdrNuU5gjRiSEazSNjpM9QIvWvH1 6n2nqrCImp4vaIDQSoPHNmj2XbSECdFxChURrnoFp6y895bfPCSrkPCJirV1w4j89oyf6UmdxTF9 mfR0_Yj5DTQODitOTl4CEs9uD6tr3t9PeoOnMtC.2Vf2OwS8BHhmliCZvImcBucUF3ipiMoJli.u pDczpzFNJt2wk5HuClBnsbGjb8z_g6MTc8RxjKKLzoEP2GMUL6VGVyzVn2__m36rBtxHrJebhXx5 ssYhUlrIirHhwIPA0EEu19BzzwBHKAUDCNVpXSOP2HXFvgk7bC.uTD5A693vX6tVcZyjWLAhV_LF lOEpq7NNtCeVtffYRL_2kN6WxZajVswNEozj54eZYvmbW2xWTocHomHGbnf_RZRSpU4fA.V1G5_M HzkOybANgTlYoUnsHwj2kNOFpspKsYn6aiXRq.7.U4nA90.m8nL0gHF_awTi..OKY4LJSeUPQN09 HpF1J5XkI_KiMBtjAyfq5I2BoborO1covrphLJkXd0A4jNZ99BqK.Q3rVeuZbkbGuQVcNkZaBghi BAFl7LuWC4hmJCOGY42U_7wTL7dUyyKOVOhoOGFzJcPOIiGPdY9R7ds1Jpn_zPASTwM4Kg_SV83e HEMOjrMTEVLmISPdbGbz3YNq5gb2s4b4Cew1CY8_zINH1d_4Yak4YC52Y3z7AkgbjfNTvoVVD8Jf 1aADU39Z6LBJq9G1eBoLjRZ3xSx3pOe2coKTiJBMa4O86K4y4XwZe_SkbX2917lCsGZw_MFDrv17 oL6L8X7mdJuIpTKnkrWC7MM9mhba8CAJ3qVCflaBB. X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic302.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 02:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--canary-production-sg3-67975bbd4b-bp49d (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 45266cb344a5ab7c345fe902a5c2c52c; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 02:05:58 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87y1wzsojx.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2022 16:37:38 +0200") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.20407 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:236725 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > According to that URL, this is still a problem in the current Emacs > (possibly), but as Eli says, if we're to make any progress here, > somebody will have to come up with a minimal test case that reproduces > the problem. Rudi, does `pixel-scroll-precision-mode' also have this problem? Most people whose hardware permits them to use that say it is vastly superior to the original `pixel-scroll-mode', both in terms of behavior and performance.