Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2022 22:21:35 +0100
>> From: Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no>
>> CC: dgutov@yandex.ru, larsi@gnus.org, 59662@debbugs.gnu.org,
>>  monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, casouri@gmail.com
>> 
>> >> Ok, will do.  In preparation for that function, we need that variable on
>> >> the emacs-29 branch, right?
>> >
>> >Why?  Why cannot we introduce the variable only on master?
>> 
>> Mostly because I want to use it for other stuff, and for merge conflict reasons, but you decide!
>> 
>> I can revise the patch to go on master and introduce the function there.
>
> Yes, please do that on master.
>
>> By the way, what is the deciding factor for what goes where wrt treesit going forward?
>
> In general, anything that doesn't need to support the minimal treesit
> modes we have now on emacs-29 should go to master.  That includes any
> new features, even if they are supported by treesit.  IOW, mot
> everything related to tree-sitter should automatically go to the
> release branch.
>
> And when in doubt, ask, as always.

Ok!  Here's the patch.  What do you all think?

Theo