From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 12:29:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87o7m4lper.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a5xrzsph.fsf@stebalien.com> <83pm6nlhll.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8gfmqyt.fsf@gmail.com> <83ilcflbua.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt1rmjjg.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8gfjnzj.fsf@gnu.org> <87edn3mbr3.fsf@gmail.com> <83mt1rjg69.fsf@gnu.org> <875y8fm7x7.fsf@gmail.com> <83lehbjdjd.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn0vkqn1.fsf@gmail.com> <83jzwvj94x.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilcfj8dy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27310"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org, steven@stebalien.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 28 12:30:20 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q3DfI-0006yI-JF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 12:30:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Df3-0005k9-NS; Sun, 28 May 2023 06:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Df1-0005k0-Lh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 06:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Df1-0005nn-Cc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 06:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Df1-0002yx-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 06:30:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 10:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63731 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 63731-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63731.168526979911425 (code B ref 63731); Sun, 28 May 2023 10:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63731) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2023 10:29:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Dew-0002yD-RG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 06:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com ([209.85.128.52]:42035) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Deu-0002xy-9Z for 63731@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 06:29:57 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f601c57d8dso16625735e9.0 for <63731@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 28 May 2023 03:29:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685269790; x=1687861790; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=xxvrAn62D/YO0Yg0fuLv4Hv3gDhFvz//07goxeJC7SA=; b=ONiI+mmU26TbPLvUP+bjGLY3uVJgPAoPxRXqxP2NCTujQZXvf+1fZnaSYS+YamMq0o HYOJMThTMY6mm69DCdN+ayTp47ghm4i+mJwdIGVrAJN6cj7wza1jkXjW9h2DQtIEcvgW T3aPUXqbuTjK1cPxx6nNRTEcMIrZEyWOEc7LgnAXmTGlg9wwZ+sHeAjELKfe6pFi1Q51 Ak64Kyse9Qx2PL6jxE8q1bmtT6u7uNy9960GR5ifTFYuKS2bo7uUhRVgznyZLIwVnX1g E/6ekrm8jhZJAJQpQQ3EpdlHUvZfwvKimvr2A2z/g4oPe7NXo8KnvHRxaF/PJaRGbnTn hLKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685269790; x=1687861790; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xxvrAn62D/YO0Yg0fuLv4Hv3gDhFvz//07goxeJC7SA=; b=jh7YF2PflBCPlVLNfwcLByfpvZPUCrKiyHP5nrRe7lJBE3tfgtalqRADJNedfD4DTn p7kTDf//N/sFS9NJ7jYWfApsz69euh3QwtbDr1lSxYh4bKw98iO8oPVqYC/EGg0buan8 M7YjrMjn5VaGS2cCdkhg6d5HNa1bYr2qc6n4NBoN0c3uJuvRBmmWbSIf+pCGapawk7I2 S/iVU5I3iy5kcQzaZBr1t0DGLV99NY2iqD2tA1u9pzR/p66+MKS8N2Kf3AYvwfGROk9A Buj73fEfJ4S2DAUDswQcSyjdTh7ubRICTwvPeLoC8etQ/cwGGzVx3kUl31/0vaYYdpkD +/mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDy1ZYn4yWOx+0eOkwTxvmQfvPBEM00NQMWXU/uYSMXH1GKb+EmG bKJmirQHcBWGMADS38iGync= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4LLZboDb57876y5+f91bWNCUbkt68okOgqMLb1Grm84MiyKO1BMX/Rd9JP/7RS3J4Z3jhfnw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4455:b0:3f6:46e:b221 with SMTP id v21-20020a05600c445500b003f6046eb221mr4278167wmn.7.1685269790178; Sun, 28 May 2023 03:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w8-20020a1cf608000000b003f18b942338sm10781500wmc.3.2023.05.28.03.29.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 28 May 2023 03:29:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83ilcfj8dy.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 26 May 2023 20:43:37 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:262526 Archived-At: >>>>> On Fri, 26 May 2023 20:43:37 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org, steven@stebalien.com >> Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 20:27:26 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >>=20 >> > From: Robert Pluim >> > Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org, steven@stebalien.com >> > Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 18:24:02 +0200 >> >=20 >> > It requires something that answers the question "what font would we >> > use for this codepoint if it was not an emoji?". Maybe we can have= a >> > separate fontset that pretends that the emoji script is equivalent= to >> > symbol? Or invent some kind of 'text-presentation-font' property to >> > put somewhere? >>=20 >> I'm not sure I understand why we don't select the right font by >> default. Selecting a non-Emoji font for a non-Emoji codepoints shou= ld >> not need any special tricks. Eli> Actually, I don't understand why there's an issue here with font Eli> selection. Are you saying that using Noto Color Emoji with Eli> CHAR+0xFE0E, when CHAR is an Emoji character, doesn't produce the Eli> textual representation of CHAR? If so, isn't that a problem with = the Eli> font? I thought all we needed to do was to hand the combination t= o an Eli> Emoji-aware font, and the font would do the rest. Now you seem to= be Eli> saying that we somehow need to select a non-Emoji font? But if so, Eli> who'd guarantee that a font that cannot display Emoji will know wh= at Eli> to do with the combination CHAR+0xFE0E? I=CA=BCm not sure: gedit displays the text representation, and libreoffice displays the emoji presentation. And the google color emoji website only shows colour glyphs. So I think it=CA=BCs up to the application to select the correct font. Robert --=20