From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#687: 23.0.60; Mouse wheel should not trigger mouse avoidance Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:02:14 -0400 Message-ID: <87myjiukeh.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <873alavzoc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <48A1DC88.3080606@gmail.com> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 687@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218569381 19062 80.91.229.12 (12 Aug 2008 19:29:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 687@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 12 21:30:33 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KSzZb-0001D5-De for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:30:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54720 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSzYf-0005sP-5X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:29:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSzWn-00053R-1K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KSzWj-00051C-Jd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:27:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38147 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KSzWi-00050f-Mv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:27:28 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:34446) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KSzWh-0007Zy-SY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:27:28 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m7CJRO7E032017; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:27:25 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m7CJA5MI026317; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:10:05 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:10:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 687 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 687-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B687.121856770623617 (code B ref 687); Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:10:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at 687) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 Aug 2008 19:01:46 +0000 Original-Received: from cyd (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m7CJ1hpT023611 for <687@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:01:44 -0700 Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07F1A57E2EC; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:02:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <48A1DC88.3080606@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:55:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:27:31 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:19341 Archived-At: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > Not sure, but my fix does not cure the problem. I think I understand > better how to reproduce it now: > > - Move the mouse pointer while scrolling with the scroll wheel. > > Can you reproduce the problem this way? I don't see anything out of the ordinary. You're going to have to be more specific.