From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11104: 24.0.94; (void-function make-local-hook): Update NEWS maybe? Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:29:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87mx71t3wf.fsf@altern.org> References: <81zkb1kera.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehsdbyo0.fsf@altern.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332930535 22905 80.91.229.3 (28 Mar 2012 10:28:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11104@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 28 12:28:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SCq7Y-0005Re-Oo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:28:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38622 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCq7Y-0002yu-3j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:28:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCq7S-0002yj-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:28:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCq7O-0005LN-85 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:28:45 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCq7O-0005LF-50 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:28:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCqbi-0000WL-5u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Bastien Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11104 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 11104-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11104.13329323991967 (code B ref 11104); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11104) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2012 10:59:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42367 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCqbe-0000Ve-8m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:59:59 -0400 Original-Received: from incoming2.cnam.fr ([163.173.128.34]:56839) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCqb5-0000Ux-Jx for 11104@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:59:56 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAEvjck+jrT4T/2dsb2JhbABCuHaBB4IJAQEEAXkFCwsNCwklDwEEDQsxExqHawS2RIoAhxIEjgKGCoFVhhGFIIR8gmk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,661,1325458800"; d="scan'208";a="30266434" Original-Received: from unknown (HELO myhost.localdomain) ([163.173.62.19]) by outgoing2.cnam.fr with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2012 12:28:01 +0200 Original-Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 993EA856E; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:29:21 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:05:35 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58230 Archived-At: Leo writes: > On 2012-03-28 04:02 +0800, Bastien wrote: >> Adding the defalias above is a more generalized backward-compatibility >> fix that other packages than Gnus would be aware of. Should we add it >> to Emacs? > > Why add it back? I think we should let those packages do it in their own > name space. When it's for XEmacs compatibility I agree. But this single line (defalias 'make-local-hook 'ignore) if added to Emacs, would be of great help for users who don't know what's wrong. -- Bastien