From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17123: 24.3.50; C-x C-c -> Invalid function: with-current-buffer-window Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 23:59:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87mwgb45a0.fsf@web.de> References: <87mwgb35dw.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395961213 10387 80.91.229.3 (27 Mar 2014 23:00:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 23:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17123@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 28 00:00:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WTJHW-0006Va-U1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTJHW-0004a5-HA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:00:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTJHO-0004P9-Bq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:00:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTJHI-0005KK-Gk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:00:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52108) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTJHI-0005Jr-EO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:00:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WTJHH-0001Bl-89 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 19:00:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 23:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17123 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 17123-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17123.13959611704503 (code B ref 17123); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 23:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17123) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Mar 2014 22:59:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53289 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WTJGj-0001AY-Sd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:59:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:59926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WTJGg-0001AP-M4 for 17123@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:59:27 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.187.234.65]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lzb94-1X7NF807O6-014nIU; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 23:59:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:22:18 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0F5X+OgzfookM4oIpr7tL+2lq2W2pyFMyQTpxB0vqLoxcWI+2Js K6zQ5KiTij+113gjVo8vpBFBrQHbedX/2VcMQ5RlNQV1GpQQ0FB/lZs5Fd3M+No4KyMVHwF E8+KMArYymS9Ac+nsvicjL5eccTwYL5N+i0kVmt1JGwIXjuuMF4fdQAqbhBeUciE3GroUjn JYKiUvk7WoesUsEEOBGoA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87465 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > (defun test (x) > > (unknown-macro (+ x 1))) > > > (defmacro unknown-macro (&rest body) `(progn ,@body)) > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Right, such code is incorrect and we do not intend to support it. Ok, that makes sense. And the "invalid function" error is a good pointer to dependency problems anyway. Michael.