From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19111: 25.0.50; 32 bits temacs.exe is linked with wrong image-base when built on 64 bit Windows host Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:12:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87mw7kpgm1.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <87fvdfrl4p.fsf@telefonica.net> <83k32q7wkl.fsf@gnu.org> <87bno2swxp.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83egsy7d2x.fsf@gnu.org> <87siheqzq9.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83389d7t89.fsf@gnu.org> <87a93lrgct.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83mw7l6bjc.fsf@gnu.org> <87389dragi.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83egsx60um.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4r5pgae.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83wq6p3qla.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3wwprln.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83zjbk38aw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416593667 10711 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2014 18:14:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:14:27 +0000 (UTC) To: 19111@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 21 19:14:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrsir-0002iH-6I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:14:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41964 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrsiq-0001br-Ny for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:14:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43385) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrsif-0001Rl-1E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:14:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrsiY-0008Bz-BA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:14:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrsiY-0008Bj-70 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XrsiX-00030T-QB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:14:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87fvdfrl4p.fsf@telefonica.net> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19111 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.141659361411506 (code B ref -1); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2014 18:13:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41176 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrsi5-0002zW-Ff for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:13:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41445) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrsi3-0002zM-73 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:13:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrshw-0007uc-BT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:13:30 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:48928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrshw-0007uY-8g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:13:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrshq-0000S2-8L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:13:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrshj-0007ox-Sf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:13:18 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrshj-0007oQ-MS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:13:11 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrshi-0002H4-1F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:13:10 +0100 Original-Received: from 132.red-79-158-48.staticip.rima-tde.net ([79.158.48.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:13:10 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 132.red-79-158-48.staticip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:13:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 132.red-79-158-48.staticip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:btF/UK1ODVE2IzYXpI9KCHGErIE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:96393 Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> + t=${t#Target: } >> > >> > Is this portable to Unix shells? If not, perhaps use the 'eval' trick >> > here. >> >> This code is never meant to be executed on other than MSYS(2)/Cygwin. >> Does the shell complain if an error is present inside an `if' that it >> doesn't enter? In other words, does the shell perform syntactic checks >> on code that it doesn't execute? > > It does, sometimes. I'll let experts to tell if this is one of those > cases. Ok. Now I have to figure out that 'eval' trick. > OTOH, we've lived without this test for quites some time, so suddenly > starting to reject any configurations that might cause this sounds too > drastic to me. Until recently there was a very limited set of MSYS/MinGW supported architectures (one). This problem couldn't happen. Now we have i686 and x86_64, which makes 4 MSYS/MinGW combinations and, of course, some users experienced the problem. IMO it is better to reject those cases where guessing the target platform might cause cryptic errors later on the build (or at runtime). The user can pass --target to `configure' to avoid the check, as its error message says.