From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19102: 24.4; outline-move-subtree-up/down error at last and second-last subtree Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:58:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87mw7ft00z.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> References: <87lhn7s522.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <83lhn789tq.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9xvruan.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <83tx1v6mur.fsf@gnu.org> <87a93nrlql.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <83lhn76iex.fsf@gnu.org> <8761easv3s.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <87r3wytcaa.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <83vbm96dxs.fsf@gnu.org> <87oas0n8sr.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <8361e84yxb.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvdcmpeg.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <87oaryop2k.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416952827 23350 80.91.229.3 (25 Nov 2014 22:00:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: paul@tilk.co, 19102@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 25 23:00:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XtO9i-0007Ga-Sj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 23:00:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59676 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtO9i-0003WQ-Ej for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:00:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35609) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtO9Z-0003W3-KE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:00:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtO9T-0006dW-Oh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XtO9T-0006cn-Lq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XtO9T-00024A-3C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:00:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19102 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19102-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19102.14169527447815 (code B ref 19102); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19102) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2014 21:59:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XtO8W-00021z-2q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:59:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:55518) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XtO8T-00021c-VF for 19102@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:59:03 -0500 Original-Received: from rosalinde.fritz.box ([89.245.100.6]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lu7a2-1Y1Oo72TIc-011P59; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 22:58:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 23 Nov 2014 23:07:49 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:J0t/EsPcUSYoC7hxhmLZXtn8Y0ED3QnR46d2b7tDTLsspfnoVgO 3lVkDvqe/XUyXanIO8Sok81EMBwD9pOeyfrHjcFWEpS/hPvOxVSQsXygoINK7wiKmVqbEJd dJ0kC0KEOxeVQetLTQ6p6MfVfUD0keX+PcUB4B9lsf9UU5ztTFPDWgzmyaiK662lpl9Ldhg 1T1GaWWGR+3zwvC+OUbmA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:96575 Archived-At: On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 23:07:49 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Does "we" refer to the outline.el code? If so, the proposed patch does >> just the opposite: it makes sure there's a final newline. > > Sounds like we're in violent agreement, then. Ok, so I take it you accept the patch, so again the question, does it qualify as a tiny change? If not, and if Paul Rankin is unable or doesn't want to sign a copyright assignment, what's the appropriate way to give him credit? Steve Berman