From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19824: 25.0.50; Support goal column in multi-line minibuffer Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:38:03 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87mw4l72xw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <871tlyppaq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <837fvp92up.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423611868 26803 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2015 23:44:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19824@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 11 00:44:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YLKTS-0001R0-Mq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:44:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42472 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLKTR-0007C8-VJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:44:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41579) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLKTO-00079Z-5G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLKTK-0005Hi-Vr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLKTK-0005Hc-St for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YLKTK-0003d2-C8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19824 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 19824-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19824.142361182113876 (code B ref 19824); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19824) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2015 23:43:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39699 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YLKSy-0003bj-TH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:43:41 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.222.226]:55538 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YLKSw-0003bZ-Ik for 19824@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost.linkov.net (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.222.226]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1825394FFD774; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:43:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <837fvp92up.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:57:02 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99246 Archived-At: > Why do you use current-column and move-to-column here, instead of > using the line-move-visual methods we use by default in any other > buffer? Is there some technical problem to use visual-line movement > in the minibuffer? If not, I think we should do that for consistency > of the user experience. line-move-visual is still used while moving point inside the minibuffer, but when moving to another history element, the whole contents of the minibuffer is erased, and new text is inserted, in which the column should be positioned correctly.