From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7918: [PATCH] cc-mode: only the first clause of a for-loop should be checked for declarations Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:46:00 -0400 Message-ID: <87mv8li9s7.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <20160425180430.GC4020@acm.fritz.box> <87lgobmwjw.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499111569 20700 195.159.176.226 (3 Jul 2017 19:52:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 19:52:49 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 7918@debbugs.gnu.org, Alan Mackenzie To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 03 21:52:43 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7Ok-00050d-4r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 21:52:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7Op-0005rb-CA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:52:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46671) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7HQ-0007kY-R8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7HQ-0002ny-0e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7HK-0002iX-8I; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7HJ-0002GU-Pv; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:45:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 19:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7918 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed confirmed patch Original-Received: via spool by 7918-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7918.14991110728650 (code B ref 7918); Mon, 03 Jul 2017 19:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7918) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2017 19:44:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7Gp-0002FR-PC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:44:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:36025) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS7Go-0002FE-1M for 7918@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:44:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f44.google.com with SMTP id m68so92343233ith.1 for <7918@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:44:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=XwizjMzeUYq3U06USsKigidUPdie9/IIkAiu9pmkslA=; b=UfrVa7XK70Yw/ZhqEzEXbE7/UL2rL3vs7KeriFVg1xws6g0o2vr+5gkTfuyc6TTdVJ FBmj4gN1CJCARB7kVMmN7Qfu8/f9s+pRlLoaCJZIWhWV5ehgKgrnAOmRilZ1ubE8mgMl 6xW1vvWUPCB0N1soOhfb5JoaWAkx3OwC8+Se40PnElo3oWc0/LX/AVgp8xQYNiaQIFS5 kgPgb684hOCASwP+GCu+o+9cvEWm91PfhkYZLwpyaJLUgOdc+LUbOgdP3PJQQZPFc2BW fhB+OFbPo50vAxRPboSbYEb+7D6zFXRGJHh6UBgA/Edp5dvWDwyNIDbZjh+whZh+GFwv tmAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=XwizjMzeUYq3U06USsKigidUPdie9/IIkAiu9pmkslA=; b=CHDFQnAfm1ieyUggR3b7BTZY3rD284k1vKKIzYhOSHk70NoN0p1BUnX4GQEnYaCPKL z4EnTe8JkHoD7ThNuVqaroyS3e4kXnSUtfgiL74TuELhdVQ6gUrMK9C6wfGRAeUOgqc8 LyjaUozINfjyuTVE8Kr995/ogW9tFVKlktnqfdKc/hoPmOxe3MYaVvAR2oActeE37rwJ JQKsDvwmyaoAlchykjXWL9wtWiF+/2pqDNyNEry9Z/DSLWM9DMzEdz1+9EzdncIhflUd XomuL2CYxTbGllmG8NnQj76wWqTAbhcADfGxNAAhqBdaobL1rrVMv1o8/Adv0M35vOvG BsPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113e2mWDmdneLgy70qhrvraedLPggIPOx+0+MIDiTVNijGUTW68D 3jjP4bJY6Le5SFwd X-Received: by 10.36.48.146 with SMTP id q140mr10245357itq.59.1499111064381; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:44:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w199sm8631517iod.15.2017.07.03.12.44.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:44:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:09:01 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134140 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > npostavs@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > >>> Bug fixed in master branch. >> >> I can confirm it's fixed in master (I wonder why the bug was reopened, >> apparently automatically?) > > Nothing gets reopened automatically. I agree that sometimes debbugs > doesn't report the details of control requests in an informative way. > In this case, the bug was reopened in May 2016 (by Alan, from internal > logs). You'd have to ask him why. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-bug-tracker/2016-05/msg00126.html Oh, I was looking at https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7918;msg=32. So all those "fake control message" things are just the original control request getting lost somehow? Ccing Alan, please reopen if I made a mistake by closing this.