From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Live System User Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32443: 27.0.50; encode-time bug Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:37:11 -0400 Message-ID: <87musagnbc.fsf@aol.com> References: <87bma4pmtt.fsf@aol.com> <87va83zed5.fsf@aol.com> <87wos9pm12.fsf@gmail.com> <87mut5yz2s.fsf@aol.com> <87lg8o5kkd.fsf@gmail.com> <875zzrzr2y.fsf@aol.com> <87k1o72dmh.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537590969 4761 195.159.176.226 (22 Sep 2018 04:36:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 04:36:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: 32443@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 22 06:36:05 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g3ZeE-000176-Vx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 06:36:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58329 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3ZgL-0000Se-DW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:38:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3ZgD-0000QH-M8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3ZgA-0001CK-HM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44365) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g3ZgA-0001CD-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g3ZgA-0000b5-7T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Live System User Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 04:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32443 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 32443-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32443.15375910412243 (code B ref 32443); Sat, 22 Sep 2018 04:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32443) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2018 04:37:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48623 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g3ZfU-0000a7-O8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:37:20 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic310-15.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com ([74.6.135.125]:37527) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g3ZfS-0000Zo-Pe for 32443@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 00:37:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aol.com; s=a2048; t=1537591033; bh=tkSkShKqasCpEwTDvzNjJfOL+5KrDDB89WojleTIIn4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:Subject; b=i+xHo97VwqUH+9xuidhy+K6FzzEzfe9NclsPb0LPjKmOrivdy/s2T6vIiP/bYdFIQszNf5QBZIJDabzTk4Bu6wNoxcxLcp1tKjptuwGt7/kOQen8mzYZZ+J1yxZ3uPb95MvSPk2EMHDyhNiGFVgu0pjX8RSMdtXh1Cg/DmxrWLBa4jUInggKdHNIErjeBE75l/vsXLBgIOTIXtdN+OMLrBMASG9cxuQtyBfx63oF90Ns9ILdzCqZjSg/udPq2vJMTAQdqHRyTwF0IReM6cLHco44yk4aPUE1IRl+N0VqIPiBGFY63mOTwOKGF6cZxme058CLM0+VTcLkxgZ/QdSryA== X-YMail-OSG: ztp9_jAVM1lP8n4H48AqACO5HsiUnzBJx9iWb0wpIlD52WU4255JYOIwbxIXSdS CgVITowUVxg8p3Xh35krA.EXuHG4Fh5K2X4CIDb7FwHFkWPJCAeBKME64lRvGS2qbpVvtMGXISKi j9qlIdNuE78Vri4jBBGSi.ZAfztugpnauzuTEPFfT79nbF75vLwrR_Lb.27W_VXaborzV2KuDlpS tMAOP_KV4rYi9PR2uW3Y7zixxcfnyB04lZ9Sp4Rmc.E9hBKWqa69jmiDbTG3aV_mubhK01FQdCAT BqA.CJ3rY8ynfd6KVfm2m6muzB_T7wHsQ5JE9RfS.q.4Oq.mpsVoT2DEkSXXGQqOqa73.fK_ph7n oAJXzGWvgX9fuo4UlAqBy2sTT3FHuQoz7.0pivycLlnr8Cs31_xaIHyHQc43u.USCTy7MXtk01Nk .47y3GuqHqqIxj3dLc4_xe2CESCNUxYPQ0CJpjrQ0GaiZP9DU2TNN_BWdGgNMztLKmdQSTJ2iRHy bNqL329oJfIuZoFxQQn4I9Gpm9uCwHq73iJAD5iSPA.B_Bncrs.L8ibD2m8NCpX79EkLXkCCEKG_ 2XwcqJZnw7x6R3Ui72MyWecayTqgZe4tMdK_jOljKhoRDQimBp1eCod6U19e3bvB.CEyispzFCa3 H3os8pvmRXsH3EOspJO8iXFR.W05rsRbb95QTqk_KSsikAoLhzW_8TdzHV9ab2eebBFgVKc0E1Ii 7oRwrfDrMDoO.NSwdChjKBTyFmPK0T6AMPQF4i1cy166Hc3Sz9qxaS1PcZKQ8_AZgrwF1o8zaSFB 2KACwueJmvsOpE0y8Ajm4ntVm.wxR3uxslSY1.dZ1C Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic310.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 04:37:13 +0000 Original-Received: from c-73-16-70-190.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (EHLO localhost.localdomain) ([73.16.70.190]) by smtp425.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID af08b07cce941ecebe4c2b88bc1ed9fe; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 04:37:12 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87k1o72dmh.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:34:30 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:150541 Archived-At: Robert Pluim writes: > Live System User writes: > >> Robert Pluim writes: > >>> None of those fail for me. Could you tell us which revision you=CA=BCre >>> currently using? Perhaps this got fixed as a side effect of some other >>> change, in which case I can bisect it. >> >> I just tried it using: >> >> Repository revision: d8bef4b519624de20baa1428dd103f61dfb220fa >> >> and got the same errpneous results. > > And that=CA=BCs more recent than my version, so the bug is still lurking > somewhere. > >>> >>> Otherwise, since you=CA=BCre the only one who can reproduce it, could y= ou >>> do 'edebug-defun' on 'parse-time-string' and step through it? That >>> might give us a better idea of what's going wrong. >> >> >> I've never used `edebug' before so I will have to get up to speed. > > SPC single steps. You can use 'e' to evaluate arbitrary expressions in > the context of the function you=CA=BCre debugging. Since single stepping > can be tedious, you can move point and use 'h' to run until you reach > point. I'm still trying to discover where the bug is using edebug, Stepping through with edebug everything appears to go fine with going through all the rules and assigning all of its resultant values (such as "Tue' equals 2 gleen from `parse-time-weekdays '), until you get to the following: (rplaca (nthcdr (pop slots) time) new-val)))))))) Once I execute `rplaca' -- "tike" and "new-val" are incorrect. =20=20 FWIW, with thw recwnt update to parse-time.el (Git 0bec064), I now get (parse-time-string "Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:17:56 -0500") (nil nil nil 21 2 2017 2 -1 nil) `Before this update, the "-1" was nil. I believe the "-1" means that DST is not known to be in effect. DST *is* in effect here. `Thanks. > > Robert