From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34975: 26.1.92; In backquote, the comma marker does not work with variable name started with dot Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:25:48 -0400 Message-ID: <87mul5ewbn.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87sgvcxpzh.fsf@web.de> <1430c67b-c447-47b4-92b3-1cba335e8193@default> <877ecnybya.fsf@web.de> <87wokae99v.fsf@gmail.com> <83mul5dih0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="236960"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, mail@xuchunyang.me, 34975@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 04 15:26:17 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hC2Nk-000zXp-76 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 15:26:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54741 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hC2Ng-0001nu-45 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:26:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hC2NX-0001mB-Pd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:26:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hC2NW-0000o7-Ta for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hC2NW-0000nG-Oa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hC2NW-0007wy-Dk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 13:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34975 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34975-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34975.155438435930551 (code B ref 34975); Thu, 04 Apr 2019 13:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34975) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2019 13:25:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43806 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hC2NT-0007wh-GH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:25:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:42300) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hC2NR-0007wU-00 for 34975@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:25:57 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f169.google.com with SMTP id p20so3127620qtc.9 for <34975@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:25:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=qO/LTT/MXGIrehs6LPuEmUHLQV5hAWDeJruehbzxAYM=; b=L274tcTPc1qamZrPt9CgNBEODOkkpBsUkr3IEfppln9Mn7m94vHA1udg6fdArQ+xyR kvOHaQ74NL76x/QD1L3UoEB90TznELfwMN5MNA1NhWhc4ZZFooeS+qD8N7K0kff9HuRd qOj2Bh9eXd1qMo9yFbCEbDUKCwsxk0PYl5DDdMZZurjnKu6MD+YqteXngkvvgx00q4Eh IdOab3Y5PCcrThgDrbW+AjEFDXKLEYo9FsB99/aHHt/s/MA7UFpIXJ6jZy5+m54ukNxi zeJLuYi6703ekkVE4IERU9DUGRbCo3oF8UsvVACVNhPr3F9556Nuy4OuGeYNmyONHiDp 0a0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=qO/LTT/MXGIrehs6LPuEmUHLQV5hAWDeJruehbzxAYM=; b=flujqnfYrTRM3Rsg9obU2szYt6qNe9mo169LCa5LER3bFXJyo14tkp87j4X6ZSq8Be 3Kiv7gAKmQoA9AFSqJxqjYV/tNxx0GJ5fJat2uDLE3WRB7TUPi/O/MUzaox90ZluTT0V 8c2MANWrQNF6xLFhLNW3TVhRj4HEt2JnUsMuL4c2HsK2vdLssCveiJFlRMUZvOBw/Z93 FLyT5xUW3iw7NvVQ/7GhutlBKWJQ3qqikXjenaWjUxV6yJ7n380tJSUbQhlbZFl8q3hv v2LMBSBuRZQVlj/HUmMdnJLaXGRCtsNUc+lytl7jgtNidye5buqun8pxByQ3VaPbv4Zv Umbg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXGz/0blHQk5F5YqkWw7LrOYAyur2tqwkg3kH/vl1TVrW3XeHCd ZjUjbicvOEafI53gCM2QHRkTUJSj X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzXKkaFMuC4pNJas0EzFE/BNkZAO1xXt0ey/BbwBGxrglOC4OSZzS6hYqeo1VD7PsGXrVIr8g== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2565:: with SMTP id 34mr5488843qtn.101.1554384351257; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 204sm10572283qki.58.2019.04.04.06.25.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:25:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83mul5dih0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 04 Apr 2019 16:10:19 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157164 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Noam Postavsky >> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 23:31:24 -0400 >> Cc: Xu Chunyang , 34975@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> There's also Bug#19790 about this. I think it makes sense to just >> remove this reader macro, as far as I can tell, nobody really wants this >> destructive splicing feature. > > How hard would it be fixing it? I'm uneasy with removing features > because we are confused about them. The destructive splicing feature was never added though. Only the reader macro part. But if you're asking about possible breakage, then yes, it's possible that someone out there wrote a macro which gives some semantics to ",.", like pcase gives its own semantics to "`" and ",".