From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33959: 26.1.90; python.el font-lock buffer wreaks havoc when company is enabled Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:01:35 -0400 Message-ID: <87mukpy2pc.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zhp5ch5n.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87pnply5da.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="175333"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: 33959@debbugs.gnu.org To: Carlos Pita Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 17 01:02:16 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hGX5h-000jNP-W8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 01:02:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43922 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGX5g-0004ST-T0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:02:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGX5a-0004S9-Is for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:02:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGX5Y-00085k-NX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:02:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGX5W-00084l-Ho for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGX5W-0008Dn-DL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33959 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 33959-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33959.155545570631581 (code B ref 33959); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 23:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33959) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2019 23:01:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38732 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGX5F-0008DJ-Ir for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:01:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:39512) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGX5D-0008D5-0a for 33959@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:01:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f173.google.com with SMTP id t28so25342777qte.6 for <33959@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:01:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=WTXzLZxrE5F/qQ2WQY3dfVUFILdBS+vKzqjlnlqE2QM=; b=Lt9hVhNoZvQho/whLxV2VJlLuAaORLZP4X0reHCESpn731v+H1Fmyq49MUyfz32gNw zYbzHrA6N/P2LZFykm7lWizyNH5trWIosvV1abub5QY8iXopmOCAhrBL6yB6mzU29XS9 svoSwyN4HulITnWhLPnhdfQqqtgce6wovmDGAjFD0fPY3L5yGKiD0cMexNiHaZrrhvga nVUBLJvKS58X9LxjZs9Y20DuFTykEVNAmA+QvzY/vcfvHeNl+D/+rtw3xl9KsmacgclA uPuUn3ekekfaRY5fuWfhSmAWCJfPrfJTxlaVfIDcYTG8aSylDy7wisp2Z5xiH9hvdjWZ fD3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=WTXzLZxrE5F/qQ2WQY3dfVUFILdBS+vKzqjlnlqE2QM=; b=AYkB4pr9zk/rZTNnEaPoFVR1iD8TFHP40w0ys6hmT874tmn0ScrG6jrl9JJuBloOdR ia9N4Jze6jiw6HiZO3Idb5x6MzqqQUzBAeZ0/IQNg8z1Alj5GEij73CP8VN2HFMs9iPw IQmMTInXzyzF88WA/eQYvEo35uLefa6JuKDxPF8RY+iQhC6YoaXJUY0aPEF2SkHEcO0H U5+JDBUfx7shRPar9fogbUTO1GvW4zPs1kbqrzRhysZSKuq7t6dZ3kP5RH+x0olhiJ5y CN0KgK/oXnk/Md++bWhY9TQXzaOV9nTazPvVRjLx5M8tft1FRqaJF2IiSi3+zcG9JwlB E+ZA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU7kEjKGIvITtxf3LIKZ0QCF/8xqQyPLhW0l0bucwhdIDnj57th desbHyTGk55jW/foJegb2aGB+RJL X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx2/c+LMIjeBiWq1M8t8x5zY9e1Pawvj/EsJ4RD86Okz5BoV693A7qybzQ61F3adFg4ph0U7g== X-Received: by 2002:aed:3bc3:: with SMTP id s3mr69439103qte.313.1555455697297; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e15sm26163242qkl.80.2019.04.16.16.01.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:01:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Carlos Pita's message of "Tue, 16 Apr 2019 19:14:55 -0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157749 Archived-At: Carlos Pita writes: > I'm unable to get your output, here the font lock buffer always > contains one line. Hmm, it might have to do with the fact that I'm running ipython over TRAMP, since my main box doesn't have IPython 6.x. But I suspect that only affects the timing, so that it's still theoretically possible (although less likely) for it to happen when running locally. > Nevertheless, I don't quite understand your example. Here: > > In [14]: 1 + len('123') + 99 + len('aa') > In [14]: 1 + len('123') + 99 + len('aa') > Out[14]: 105 > > How do you manage to have two input lines with the same prompt number? I don't know, I didn't realize it was abnormal. As far as I can tell, the prompt number increases by a random amount (sometimes 0) each time I press enter. > Is that an artifact of copy pasting from the REPL? No, that's the real text of my *Python* buffer, unedited. > if your example just consists of successively sending the line `1 + > len('123') + 99 + len('aa')` many times, I'm unable to reproduce the > case (after my patch is applied, that is, with this definition My example consists of successively *typing* the line "1 + len('123') + 99 + len('aa')", it usually takes about 3 tries before I see trouble.