From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 35453@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#35453: 26.1; Poor performance of vertical-motion in large org buffer
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 18:36:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mujk6ocq.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <834l68lwoz.fsf@gnu.org>
> There are no intervals in this story. The way overlays are
> implemented, they don't use intervals (if by that you mean the
> facilities in intervals.c). Someone was working on making overlays
> more efficient by changing the low-level implementation details, but
> that work is yet unfinished.
I see. Hope that overlays will be optimised eventually...
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com>
>> Cc: 35453@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 05 May 2019 09:05:46 +0800
>>
>> > Of course, if someone comes up with ideas how to speed up
>> > vertical-motion without changing what Org does with overlays and/or
>> > how overlays are implemented, such ideas will be most welcome.
>>
>> Rather dumb idea.
>> Currently, vertical-motion just loops over all the intervals in the
>> buffer. What if we optimise next-single-char-property-change and use it
>> in vertical-motion? Say, the interval data structure can extended. In
>> addition to the currently available pointers to next and previous
>> intervals, each (or just 'invisible') property of the interval might
>> also contain a pointer to next/previous interval with different property
>> value. Then, by increasing the structure size a bit, we can
>> significantly speed up the buffer motion commands.
>
> There are no intervals in this story. The way overlays are
> implemented, they don't use intervals (if by that you mean the
> facilities in intervals.c). Someone was working on making overlays
> more efficient by changing the low-level implementation details, but
> that work is yet unfinished.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-18 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-25 6:23 bug#35453: 26.1; Poor performance of vertical-motion in large org buffer 'Ihor Radchenko'
2019-04-28 15:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-05 1:05 ` Ihor Radchenko
2019-05-05 15:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-05-18 10:36 ` Ihor Radchenko [this message]
2022-10-29 9:02 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-29 10:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-10-29 13:31 ` Stefan Kangas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mujk6ocq.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me \
--to=yantar92@gmail.com \
--cc=35453@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).