From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17272: bug#19064: bug#17272: bug#19064: 25.0.50; `message' overwrites `y-or-n-p' prompt, so user misses it Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:06:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87mucy4cb2.fsf@web.de> References: <8ea0a3fa-5169-4493-bd54-3ebe47836a35@default> <87r3i9nped.fsf@gnus.org> <87wps1m7co.fsf@web.de> <87y4chjdop.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8ys3131.fsf@gnus.org> <875zjx6hs6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sgmy3x22.fsf@gnus.org> <871rugbqmy.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87d0dxyh7z.fsf@gnus.org> <53c55db5-d623-4946-af2e-d141e7bc7acd@default> <87sgmrpir5.fsf@web.de> <87mucya2a7.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="144293"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Juri Linkov , 17272@debbugs.gnu.org, 19064@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 18:08:27 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVIba-000bKI-Ks for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:08:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60066 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVIbZ-00040g-9Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:08:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54305) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVIbD-0003xM-OZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:08:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVIbC-0003Eb-NP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:08:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVIbC-0003EL-Ff for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVIbC-0005dV-6L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17272 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 17272-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17272.157375122421603 (code B ref 17272); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17272) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2019 17:07:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35143 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVIaF-0005cH-DL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:07:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:53629) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVIaD-0005bh-LE; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:07:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1573751205; bh=fig1cgkFzmCNMAwqpyUgPhVZljXO+REHXIYWjGZfcd4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=rQGA2F+f7jtw8OipjS6llSeJwmj2d/9qG6717XU+gm83lIKIms5vcYgKtJEAaOqJb uCqAnfVm9wH/TcC8GpZCunnkwF4VMGF90Ou1gm+DleMhAQyxZvwayk6E2nINsbdjuZ YVLWO1hNQ+Z5pNQL2feNk0k24SyJeBip1b4nJna0= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.222.9]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb004 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ljgd6-1htkq43Xfk-00bedZ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 18:06:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:28:50 -0800 (PST)") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:7qmbO4MYF7fPbHTih6BNbaWOTlsHqMcwCmoYa7ldS3ZDMoLaVpF cQCReHA43caXHxOsAniah0Goq1FQbhr8AJdhylDClKgTjHC9Ns/LUXtROXnjtB32x41974H txIX8nWGCoFAw2b/TrOMR+3NfHcaTUB60YigkPWOOfAIvSMYfvcwGHNkJV5GJKE8E3XOKS0 qYppZMx12RSKtSe3IeQTw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:14VSYp0y/VM=:BsLcSC5TfevL/YejNmz3yc ikrdW3oQNsbHl6+0/RMsDYC89+xTfUdoCPujTgDc3zarOwMBH7BtBZ6Gm0vUxRTWVWjBqqVXo 7mjkSul3aF/k1Ncp6goFnwGtykmyUcDxyjhK15I0c1/HjebzcANU/MwtAy1aVYIVoVx373tm7 XL2B9SuJCdl0JGpGBFgn2iTKlsx5Cro3yMjVDVGOfMB4k3ajuz/oiPzxTBABbwHX+EjUzdpEr v1G2rB0Qw2Bw89uKmAIg+2GSJTfwkyDZywsKLXpwNuvlpUxqS61t5tDPC12HXfYS4rd8fzuAs AfIFPFho70thz2D/YkYj6BispZlmdzSSm78l+NzNvhc555kDEMXnZ/HIEwp3z0KlpYIB/xXsK q612QTOyyR84wsLN5aJtb7U6o/eIy9UKT7BeYWMqBLtPvAgx515ayJraK4R5d+3xDDp2qDkyc 5r6yKMC5+FV8UYeQblE3GbvYfVpEGjq7QsQPIydNnezldWJVo48Pdy4U1nqLlG0NuO+dGGRbI How1Gi7AxTHLCNYiQ1N5yFulREynlhfU4L7wIaeZbr88BMZbb34qT6XF3GD1VPrrRUuZkCbxH j23iR8cWCiS+0+9grSGo3Af68kKXw16cFqjU+8OYRxegTfxF07IB6GjR7WHvZJCJ9U6862pzY G0QNT5bPChY17aJNxTYtT1/bM+Fu+uLGxsfN6d22pdWiGmK9nXdefRoSt44dKwzkmwntz989W +0W3q7dN88ogD76aMT9np9DMKtwMw6wWrUGJbbuzNGcD33Wnr8q2gE79XlYuEp3tiMgx0YuH X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171604 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > My reply was that input is in the minibuffer, > and both `message' and `y-or-n-p' write to the > echo area (or at least they both did), so I > can't imagine how minibuffer input is lost or > "permanently hidden". Ah, ok. I think the posters just confused minibuffer and echo area for the case of y-or-n-p then (at least did I). > > > Can someone please confirm that that's not the case? > > > > I think Juri did that. > > I didn't think so - not explicitly. He confirmed > your "AFAICT only the behavior..." description, but > also your statement that "`y-or-n-p' has been > reimplemented to use read-from-minibuffer instead of > read-key" statement. (Or perhaps just one of those?) > > There are mentions in this thread (and others?) of > `minibuffer-message' being used in place of `message' > when the minibuffer is active. Yes - in the reported situations, not generally...maybe someone could send Drew an accumulated diff of all changes or so? > And I disagreed that `y-or-n-p' should read from > the minibuffer instead of reading a key. I guess this can be debated - I don't have an opinion so far. Michael.