Tomotaka SUWA <tomotaka.suwa@gmail.com> writes:

>> Thanks for this report. It might be simpler to wrap the whole thing in a
>> single save-restriction+narrow-to-headers, since the function gets
>> called four times. What do you think?
>
> I wrote the patch paying attention to minimize side effects since I'm not
> familiar with that functionality. So if `gnus-registry-spool-action' is
> interested in only mail headers, your proposal is much better.

Okay! Would you be willing to give the attached diff a quick test?

Thanks,
Eric