From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Cc: Winston <wbe@psr.com>, 28439@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions prompt
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:20:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mu1r6p7s.fsf@gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31212504-6d1a-1a41-9b7b-e22e42b95fb9@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Thu, 28 Sep 2017 23:47:34 +0300")
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:
> On 9/28/17 2:06 AM, Winston wrote:
>
>> Unless you want to argue that xref-find-definitions is a
>> "completion", doing that would mean that completion-ignore-case has an
>> unexpected side-effect (namely, that it affects a function that is not a
>> "completion"). On programming aesthetic grounds, then, I'd argue that
>> xref-ignore-case (or whatever you want to call it) would be better.
>
> This is just splitting hairs. xref-ignore-case will default to
> completion-ignore-case, and you'd be able to give the same complaint.
Skimming this thread, it seems that there was concern that xref is
inconsistent here somehow, but no actual use case was shown where this
happens. So I'm closing this bug report -- if this is a problem seen in
the wild, please respond to the debbugs address and we'll reopen.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-15 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-12 22:37 bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions prompt TAB Winston
2017-09-12 23:24 ` Stephen Berman
2017-09-12 23:31 ` bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions Winston
2017-09-13 15:30 ` bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions prompt TAB Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-13 23:04 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-09-14 17:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-19 0:55 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-09-19 4:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-14 18:21 ` bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions prompt Winston
2017-09-14 22:05 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-09-14 22:33 ` bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent Winston
2017-09-19 0:41 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-09-27 23:07 ` bug#28439: suggestion: support case-independent xref-find-definitions prompt Winston
2017-09-28 20:47 ` Dmitry Gutov
2020-09-15 15:20 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mu1r6p7s.fsf@gnus.org \
--to=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=28439@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
--cc=wbe@psr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).