From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44664: 28.0.50; troubles with some chars in term Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:58:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87mtz0iix3.fsf@gnus.org> References: <83tutoqaot.fsf@gnu.org> <83blfvr8xs.fsf@gnu.org> <873617zlor.fsf@igel.home> <838sazqr2r.fsf@gnu.org> <877dqjhy0x.fsf@igel.home> <873617m4tv.fsf@gnus.org> <834klmr989.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfeyl6l9.fsf@gnus.org> <838sayowgd.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1opjbs1.fsf@gnus.org> <837dqg1nqa.fsf@gnu.org> <878sarcn31.fsf@gnus.org> <83v9duu5w5.fsf@gnu.org> <87tute0vu6.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtz5sb3o.fsf@gnu.org> <87blfkzbsu.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0u8qk2i.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9drkzjw.fsf@gnus.org> <83im9rp66g.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16568"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, bugs@gnu.support, 44664@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 29 10:59:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjJU6-00049C-R4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:59:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42402 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjJU5-0005nJ-AM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 04:59:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjJTy-0005n0-Hf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 04:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjJTy-0002th-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 04:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjJTy-0006Xa-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 04:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 09:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44664 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 44664-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44664.160664390825098 (code B ref 44664); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 09:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44664) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 09:58:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49740 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjJTQ-0006Wj-GH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 04:58:28 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjJTP-0006WX-2q for 44664@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 04:58:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/x/TLEd6hnBP05Uf03HoBDkXmHbGCG+MKYSAjclTyqY=; b=TkfHCXJOX7EZd2BLyxGqrAlnsq IVeRHCiqRiAD1iHluugTsh7/baMuoy1hi1A6bIMEDz5bDaONT/HRBenZvha9e6L6XdWth76khwQBT NnOGMruaI53jz2Dg9sL+M0k0W/rNeBxi2qDNefuR7r8oUvJa85XqnGKMwDmBmq26w2ak=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjJTG-0004BL-9C; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:58:20 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAADFBMVEWYX16GWlrXyL7/ //9u4OxpAAAAAWJLR0QDEQxM8gAAAAd0SU1FB+QLHQkrEYezq3MAAAGGSURBVCjPPZHBattAEIZn hRWoTq6Ie/ApFAphnkIJOfkkjMYUnXps9RSycUrYUxHJxaeVcMzqf8rOyEoEy+ynf/bfnRkiopWU jn4yoHtKpSLa4APKwv2awUn65H6oRAU5J9vzohWFilwh3C/om8JXSssaozp4hQeRBuPScQZalkth jAXFLcinRAZJuAUhFApxwW0KindPB31JDrcxKFSAfynZIPO4NBr0npgioFsHoG8ofGnAr2sg0obC /QaH56YDpTWFZI3Qc76XiomyDuCXf2QGlF2sLI+pOH4HzsdE9xe64xF4/n1ok9NAAyIjfcwPf7sT 6W3Ze0FAWNUUAR/shBmArxs/wfzFP67+BIyioIcw6NqLpsXBwOe4MYiDisPRpjClmYHjq1vQpkep QI39TeD9SrtTGyzhu7Oe2QJHLd+/2gt2Wg3axL/ZsHRGe27Zv+0M1OE72LeWJipf5ueRbCe4NkR2 FthP9Yg6oOfTVTGHPa9nUIf+vp5hih/K5JDPUFm0O/EfFb0JCzV+bpUAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3Jl YXRlADIwMjAtMTEtMjlUMDk6NDM6MTcrMDA6MDBiKL+MAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIw LTExLTI5VDA5OjQzOjE3KzAwOjAwE3UHMAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Osayomore Joseph & The Creative 7's _Nigeria 70 (No Wahala: Highlife, Afro-Funk & Juju 1973-1987)_: "Obonogbozu" In-Reply-To: <83im9rp66g.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:14:47 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194532 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> You mean they are so wide that compressing them will make them illegible? > > I don't know how to "compress" glyphs, actually. I hoped that we can > get away with just "padding", which boils down to enlarging their > width metrics. But if we need to make the width significantly smaller > than the font glyph font says, I don't know what would be the effect > of that, and I have no idea how to "shrink" a glyph on display. Oh, I thought you said that we shrink some glyphs vertically already? I imagined shrinking the width of a glyph would mean just throwing away some vertical lines, or specify a transformation matrix, or something. (I have not looked at the code, as you can tell.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no