From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
Cc: 50297@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#50297: 28.0.50; Aggregate project functions for project.el
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 13:30:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtovds0o.fsf@posteo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c88cae7-4175-9c1e-cf20-188883e6e617@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 1 Sep 2021 04:07:39 +0300")
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:
> Hi!
>
> On 31.08.2021 15:47, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>> The following patch introduces a few functions for aggregate project
>> maintenance:
>> - project-find-projects-under
>> Select a directory with projects to index all at once.
>
> I wonder how popular this is going to be. Do you have a flat directory
> with projects which you only want scanned one time?
I clone most code into a directory, and I have seen others do so
too. That being said, it might just be something unusual in the big
picture.
> Another issue, is that it's not going to find nested projects (and
> project.el does support those).
My first implementation of the command tried to so something like that,
but it was rather slow (even if I currently only have 20 projects
checked out), and indexed a lot of projects that I wasn't interested
in. Maybe I can look into how it can be accelerated or only search for
nested projects when a prefix argument is supplied/not supplied.
> Suppose we do add it, how about the name
> 'project-remember-projects-under'? By analogy with
> 'project-remember-project'.
I like it.
> Adding a new arg for the latter is fine by me either way.
>
>> - project-remove-zombie-projects
>> Check if all known projects still exist and remove those
>> that don't anymore
>
> Perhaps we should rename 'project-remove-known-project' to
> 'project-forget-known-project'? That would make for a nice symmetry.
>
> Then this function could be called 'project-forget-zombie-projects'.
This also make sense. Initially I wanted to name the command that way,
but then decided to go with "remove" to keep the naming consistent.
> I'm thinking about this about the slight connotation of 'remove' which
> can mean removing from disk.
>
> Another approach would be to call this or similar code automatically
> before saving the list (and cap the number of remembered projects),
> but that comes with its own tradeoffs.
I can try it out, but I fear it might lead to annoying pauses,
especially when a project was indexed via TRAMP.
>> - project-remove-projects-under
>> Remove all projects in a directory (inverse of
>> project-find-projects-under).
>
> Similar question about popularity, but this one won't have a problem
> with semantics, at least (recursive-vs-non-recursive).
>
>> Especially the last two are useful to maintain a clean project list
>> without having to manually remove every project one by one.
>
> What if the goal was to maintain a clean project list but minimize the
> manual management of it by the user?
>
> Can you imagine a solution for that? What would be the downsides,
> compared to the present proposal?
I can imagine zombie projects being cleaned up automatically, but
the motivation to write project-remove-projects-under was to remove
projects that were falsely indexed.
An entirely different approach might be to implement a tabulated list
major mode to manage projects, comparable to package-list.
--
Philip Kaludercic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-02 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-31 12:47 bug#50297: 28.0.50; Aggregate project functions for project.el Philip Kaludercic
2021-09-01 1:07 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-02 13:30 ` Philip Kaludercic [this message]
2021-09-02 14:45 ` Philip Kaludercic
2021-09-02 15:56 ` Juri Linkov
2021-09-03 1:02 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-03 0:55 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-22 0:31 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-22 7:15 ` Philip Kaludercic
2021-09-22 12:13 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-22 16:00 ` Juri Linkov
2021-09-22 16:44 ` Philip Kaludercic
2021-09-22 17:34 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-22 18:06 ` Philip Kaludercic
2021-09-22 18:25 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-22 18:53 ` Philip Kaludercic
2021-09-22 18:55 ` Philip Kaludercic
2021-09-23 2:44 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-23 10:46 ` Philip Kaludercic
2021-09-23 11:56 ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-23 12:08 ` Philip Kaludercic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mtovds0o.fsf@posteo.net \
--to=philipk@posteo.net \
--cc=50297@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).